Steve Moore and Another v Innocent Ndagijimana (Civil Appeal No. 6 of 2023)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court dismissed an appeal challenging a trial magistrate's failure to award costs. The court held that under section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act, costs are within the court's discretion and an appellate court may only interfere where discretion is not exercised judiciously. The appellants failed to show any matter or information the trial court overlooked in declining to award costs, and did not demonstrate an abuse of discretion.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs
Facts
The appellants appealed a decision of the Kisoro Chief Magistrate's Court in Civil Suit No. 001 of 2021. The sole ground of appeal was that the trial magistrate erred in failing to award the appellants costs. The appellants sought to have the appeal allowed with costs. No other details of the underlying suit were provided in the judgment.
Issues
- Whether the learned Trial Magistrate erred in law and fact when he failed to award the appellants' costs in Civil Suit No. 001 of 2021.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
Cases cited (3)
- Abeso v Ocen (Civil Appeal No. 19 of 2023)
- Kwizera v Attorney General (2017 UGSC 3)
- SDV Transami v Nsibambi Enterprises ([2008] HCB 94)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.