Suleiman v African Union and African Union Commission (Ruling) (Application No. 014-2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights held that it manifestly lacks jurisdiction to consider an application filed against the African Union and the African Union Commission. The Court's jurisdiction under Article 3 of the Protocol extends only to cases against State Parties to the Protocol. As international organisations that are not parties to the Protocol, the AU and AUC cannot be subject to legal obligations arising from it, consistent with the Vienna Convention and the Court's precedent in Femi Falana v. African Union.
Outcome
Application dismissed for manifest lack of jurisdiction
Facts
In February 2024, the African Union invited applications for the position of Chairperson of the African Union Commission, publishing requirements including leadership skills and vision to advance Agenda 2063. The Applicant, a Nigerian national who was not a candidate, filed an application in the public interest on behalf of all adult Africans. He alleged that the pre-selection process was flawed because nominated candidates' qualifications were not properly vetted and some did not meet the published requirements. The Application was filed on 1 October 2024 and registered on 29 January 2025. The Respondents did not file a Response.
Issues
- Whether the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights has jurisdiction to consider an application filed against the African Union and the African Union Commission, which are not State Parties to the Protocol.
Orders
- The Court holds that it manifestly lacks jurisdiction to consider the Application.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (6)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 13
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 25
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 3
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 5
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 34(6)
- Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations Article 34
Cases cited (1)
- Femi Falana v. African Union (Jurisdiction) (26 June 2012) 1 AfCLR 118
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.