Wakilii

Suresh Ghelani v City Casino Limited & 3 Others (Civil Suit 1207 of 1999)

High Court · [2002] UGCOMMC 22 · 2002 Judgment for Plaintiff AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
First instance civil suit for recovery of loan. Judgment in default after defendants failed to file defence following substituted service.
Decision
Judgment entered against 1st Defendant (City Casino Limited) for principal sum, contractual interest, general damages and costs. 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants held not personally liable.

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that the plaintiff lent US$25,000 to the 1st defendant company through its directors. The company is liable for the debt as a separate legal entity, but the individual directors (2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants) are not personally liable where they borrowed on behalf of the company and the plaintiff knew he was dealing with the company. Judgment entered against the 1st defendant only for principal, interest at 3% per month, and general damages.

Outcome

Judgment entered against 1st Defendant (City Casino Limited) for principal sum, contractual interest, general damages and costs. 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants held not personally liable.

Facts

The plaintiff lent US$25,000 to the defendants in June 1997 at the request of the 2nd and 4th defendants (directors of the 1st defendant company, City Casino Limited) who were facing cash shortage. The loan was to be repaid within three months. A post-dated cheque dated 6 September 1997 was issued by City Casino as security. The plaintiff agreed to delays in presenting the cheque at the defendants' request. When eventually deposited in December, the cheque was dishonoured for insufficient funds. The 2nd defendant's mother promised to pay US$10,000 from Canada but receipt was not confirmed. The defendants left the country and City Casino closed. Despite demands from lawyers and auctioneers, and a police statement by the 2nd defendant admitting the debt, no repayment was made. The plaintiff brought suit; defendants were served by substituted service but failed to file defence.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff lent the Defendants the money claimed.
  2. Whether the Defendants repaid the money.
  3. Whether the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants are also liable.
  4. What relief is appropriate.

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the Plaintiff against the 1st Defendant only.
  • 1st Defendant to pay US$25,000.
  • Interest on US$25,000 with effect from 6 September 1997 at 3% per month until payment in full.
  • General damages of US$1,500.
  • Interest on general damages from date of judgment until payment in full at court rate.
  • Costs of the suit awarded to the Plaintiff.

Rules and key headnotes

Company Law — Separate Legal Personality — Liability of Company versus Directors
A company is a separate legal entity from its directors or shareholders. Once a company is incorporated it acquires a separate legal personality and can sue and be sued in its own name. Directors who borrow money on behalf of a company are not personally liable for the company's debts where the lender knew he was dealing with the company.
Contract Law — Loan Agreements — Proof of Loan and Non-Repayment
A loan is established by evidence that money was advanced, the circumstances of the advance, and security given. Non-repayment is proven by evidence of dishonoured cheques, unfulfilled promises to pay, and the lender's unsuccessful attempts to recover the debt through lawyers and auctioneers.
Damages & Quantum — General Damages for Breach of Contract — Assessment
General damages are awarded for breach of a loan agreement where the borrower fails to repay within the agreed period despite repeated demands. The assessment takes into account the delay in payment and the lender's efforts to recover the debt.
Banking & Finance — Commercial Loans — Interest on Loans
Where parties agree to interest on a commercial loan at a specified rate, the borrower is liable to pay interest at that rate from the date payment became due until payment in full.

Cases cited (1)

  • Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Suresh Ghelani v City Casino Limited & 3 Others (Civil Suit 1207 of 1999) [2002] UGCommC 22 (28 January 2002)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.