Tabu & Another v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 828 of 2014)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Failure to deduct the remand period rendered the sentences unconstitutional; the Court of Appeal set them aside and resentenced both appellants afresh under section 11 of the Judicature Act.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Tabu & Another applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.