Tagayala v Sugar Corporation of Uganda Ltd (H.C.C.S. no. 28 of 1990)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Facts
The plaintiff, William Tagayala trading as Tagayala Distributors, entered into an agreement with the defendant, Sugar Corporation of Uganda Ltd, to harvest sugar cane and transport it to the defendant's factory. The plaintiff claimed he performed his obligations but the defendant terminated the contract prematurely after two months. The plaintiff sued for breach, claiming the contract was to last one year. The defendant contended the plaintiff failed to perform according to agreed terms, justifying termination. The plaintiff sought damages totaling 13,229,990/= with interest and costs.
Issues
- Whether or not the plaintiff ever entered into a contract with the defendant to harvest the defendant's sugar cane
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.