Tayebwa Robert v Cresensio Mukasa (Civil Application No. 11 of 2017)
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 4 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
A non-party cannot invoke the slip rule under Rule 35 to reverse a Supreme Court decision, and a beneficiary claiming land must hold letters of administration.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Tayebwa Robert applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.