The Ex-Officio Agent of the Public Trustees v Fathil (C.A. 10-1930 (Msa.).)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Under Sheria law, a Bai Salami contract (sale of a definite article for cash with delivery after a certain period) cannot be fulfilled by mere repayment of the sum paid. The purchaser is entitled to receive the article itself or its market value. The appeal was dismissed and the decree for payment of forty frasilas of copra at market value upheld.
Outcome
Decree of the Liwali's Court at Lamu upheld requiring payment of forty frasilas of copra or its market value of Sh. 240
Facts
The respondent sued in the Liwali's Court at Lamu to recover Sh. 240, being the price of forty frasilas of copra at the market rate of Sh. 6 per frasila. The claim was based on two documents evidencing a Bai Salami transaction whereby the deceased Hamed Bin Lali had sold copra to the respondent for cash, to be delivered at a future date. The appellant, as administrator of the deceased's estate, contended that liability was limited to refunding the original sum paid of Sh. 160. The Liwali gave judgment for the respondent for forty frasilas of copra and costs. Neither party appeared at the appeal hearing, and the matter was dealt with on written statements in accordance with local practice.
Issues
- Whether under Sheria (Bai Salami) a contract for sale of a definite article for cash to be delivered after a certain period can be fulfilled by repayment of the sum paid, or whether the purchaser is entitled to receive the article itself or its market value.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.