The Registered Trustees of Kabale Diocese v Mukasekura Donatilla (High Court Civil Suit No. 0025 of 2021)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Special damages must be specifically pleaded and proved; items not particularised in the plaint cannot be awarded at trial. Mesne profits are assessed based on market rent for the period of unlawful occupation, taking into account property condition and location. General damages for breach of contract are assessed by reference to the contract value and economic inconvenience suffered. Court awarded UGX 18,000,000 mesne profits for 18 months unlawful occupation and UGX 15,000,000 general damages.
Outcome
Judgment entered for the Plaintiff with monetary awards for mesne profits and general damages
Facts
The Plaintiff purchased property from the Defendant under a sale agreement. The Defendant subsequently purported to terminate the sale by letter dated 6 October 2021 and lodged a caveat on the property while remaining in occupation. The Plaintiff had taken a loan to finance the purchase. The Defendant refused to vacate despite demands and remained in possession for approximately 18 months. When the Defendant eventually vacated in March 2023, the property was in poor condition with broken plumbing and toilets. The parties entered partial consent on liability issues, leaving only quantum of damages for court determination.
Issues
- Whether special damages claimed but not pleaded in the plaint can be awarded.
- What is the appropriate quantum of mesne profits for unlawful occupation of property following breach of sale agreement.
- What is the appropriate quantum of general damages for breach of a property sale agreement and wrongful retention of possession.
Orders
- The Plaintiff is awarded mesne profits of UGX 18,000,000.
- The Plaintiff is awarded general damages of UGX 15,000,000.
- The Plaintiff is awarded costs of this suit.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
Cases cited (5)
- Haji Asuman Mutekanga v Equator Growers (U) Ltd (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 0007 of 1995)
- Gapco (U) Ltd v A.S Transporters (U) Ltd (Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 18 of 2004)
- Surgipharm Uganda Ltd v Anatoli Batabane (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 0011 of 2020)
- Thalion International Ltd v Vivo Energy Uganda Ltd (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 0018 of 2022)
- Kibimba Rice Limited v Umar Salim (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 0077 of 1992)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.