Torr v Kyomuhendo (Miscellaneous Application 210 of 2023)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court granted the applicant's application for an order to attend proceedings in the underlying civil suit via visual audio link. The court found this to be a fit and proper case for such an order after studying the pleadings and relevant law. Costs were awarded in the cause.
Outcome
Application granted with costs in the cause
Facts
The applicant sought an order to attend court proceedings via visual audio link in the underlying civil suit (HCCS No. 644 of 2017). Both parties were absent on the date of the ruling. The court considered the pleadings on record and relevant law.
Issues
- Whether the applicant should be granted an order to attend court proceedings via visual audio link
Orders
- Application granted allowing the applicant to attend proceedings in HCCS No. 644 of 2017 via visual audio link.
- Costs of the application shall be in the cause.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.