Tral Ltd v Attorney General (CAD ARB 10 of 2012)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that a dispute exists when one party makes a demand and the other does not respond or admit the claim. The duty to pursue amicable resolution under a dispute resolution clause falls equally on both parties. Where the respondent remained silent for 93 days after receiving notice of arbitration and failed to engage with either the substantive dispute or the dispute resolution process, the respondent waived the amicable resolution requirement. The application for compulsory appointment of an arbitrator was not premature. One arbitrator appointed under section 10(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Outcome
Arbitrator appointed; matter to proceed to arbitration
Facts
The Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development contracted Tral Ltd on 12 November 2009 to supply an executive tent. Tral Ltd claimed the respondent failed to pay the final 20% balance, accrued interest from 11 February 2011, and withholding tax receipts. On 12 March 2012, Tral Ltd issued a notice of arbitration proposing CADER as the appointing authority. The respondent did not respond to the notice or take any action regarding arbitration. On 11 May 2012, 82 days after the notice, Tral Ltd filed an application for compulsory appointment of an arbitrator. The contract contained a staggered dispute resolution clause requiring parties to first attempt amicable resolution for 28 days before proceeding to arbitration. The respondent argued the application was premature because the applicant had not pursued amicable resolution.
Issues
- Whether the application for compulsory appointment of an arbitrator was premature given the respondent's failure to respond to the notice of arbitration.
- Whether a dispute existed between the parties sufficient to trigger the arbitration clause.
- Whether the applicant complied with the preliminary amicable resolution requirement in the dispute resolution clause before seeking arbitration.
Orders
- Application for compulsory appointment of arbitrator granted.
- James Nangwala appointed as sole arbitrator.
- In the event James Nangwala cannot accept appointment, Rachel Kabala or Jackie Nakalembe to be approached in sequential order.
- Costs of the application awarded to the applicant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act Cap.4 s.10(2)
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act s.12(1)
Cases cited (5)
- Hayter v Nelson [1990] 2 Lloyd's Rep 265
- The M Eregli [1981] 2 Lloyd's Rep 169
- Ellerine v Klinger [1982] 1 WLR 1375
- Ellerine Bros Ltd v Klinger [1982] 2 All ER 737
- Heyman v Darwins [1942] All ER 337
Cases citing this judgment (1)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.