True African (U) Limited v Flutterwave, Inc. (Miscellaneous Application 706 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the summary suit because the underlying contractual dispute arose from agreements containing an arbitration clause. A subsequent email proposing a payment plan did not constitute a separate agreement severable from the arbitration clause. Under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the court cannot intervene in matters governed by that Act. The summary suit was struck off for want of jurisdiction.
Outcome
Summary suit struck off for want of jurisdiction; matter must proceed to arbitration under the contractual arbitration clause
Facts
On 10 October 2018, Flutterwave and True African executed a Bulk Collection and Payment Agreement under which True African would disburse payments to Flutterwave's customers using its PAYLEO mobile platform. In March 2023, Flutterwave experienced delays in settlements from True African. After correspondence, True African began processing payments in installments in breach of agreed terms. On 5 June 2023, True African's managing director sent an email admitting the debt and proposing a payment plan to settle UGX 517,781,538.69. True African paid only one installment and failed to remit further payments. Flutterwave instituted Civil Suit No. 0422 of 2023 to recover the debt. True African applied to strike out the suit on grounds that the underlying agreements contained an arbitration clause requiring disputes to be referred to arbitration.
Issues
- Whether this Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the summary suit.
- Whether there is a bonafide defence to, or any triable issue in, the summary suit.
Orders
- Civil Suit No. 0290 of 2024 is struck off the record for want of jurisdiction.
- This application is overtaken by events and it is, accordingly, dismissed.
- Costs of this application and of the summary suit, if any, are awarded to the Applicant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act Cap 5 s.9
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 (as amended) Article 139(1)
Cases cited (1)
- Desai v Warsama (1967) EA 351
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.