Tubaire v Uganda (Criminal Miscellaneous Application 59 of 2022)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the applicant established a fixed place of abode within the jurisdiction through LC I introduction letters and presented four suitable sureties with capacity to compel compliance with bail conditions. The court exercised its discretion under Article 23(6)(a) of the Constitution and Section 14 of the Trial on Indictments Act to grant bail on terms including cash bail and monthly reporting. The right to bail is fundamental and premised on the presumption of innocence; an accused person must not be deprived of liberty unreasonably where not proven guilty.
Outcome
Applicant released on bail pending trial subject to specified conditions
Facts
The applicant was charged with three counts: murder contrary to sections 188 and 189 of the Penal Code Act, conspiracy to murder contrary to section 208, and accessory after the fact to murder contrary to section 206. He was remanded to Kirinya Government Prison. The applicant applied for bail asserting that he is the sole breadwinner for three children, seven orphans, and one elderly dependent; that he suffers from medical conditions requiring attention; that he has a fixed place of abode at Triangle Zone, Katende Ward, Bugembe Town Council, Jinja District; and that he has no previous criminal record. The prosecution objected on grounds that the applicant's national identity card was not availed, his LC I introduction letter lacked proper authentication, there were inconsistencies in documentation for one surety, and medical evidence was insufficient. The applicant presented five sureties, one of whom the court found unsuitable due to documentary inconsistencies.
Issues
- Whether the applicant has established a fixed place of abode within the jurisdiction of the court.
- Whether the applicant has presented substantial and suitable sureties.
- Whether the applicant is likely to abscond if released on bail.
- Whether it is in the interests of justice to grant the applicant bail pending trial.
Orders
- Application granted.
- Applicant released on bail.
- Cash bail of UGX 1,000,000.
- Non-cash bail of UGX 4,000,000 against each of four sureties.
- Applicant to report to Deputy Registrar on second Wednesday of each month with effect from 13 September 2023.
- Contravention of bail terms will result in automatic cancellation of bail.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (11)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 Article 23(6)(a)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 Article 28(3)(a)
- Trial on Indictments Act Cap 23 s.14(1)
- Trial on Indictments Act Cap 23 s.15
- Trial on Indictments Act Cap 23 s.15(4)
- Judicature (Criminal Procedure) (Applications) Rules SI 38-8 Rule 2
- Judicature (Criminal Procedure) (Applications) Rules SI 38-8 Rule 4
- Penal Code Act Cap 120 s.188
- Penal Code Act Cap 120 s.189
- Penal Code Act Cap 120 s.208
- Penal Code Act Cap 120 s.206
Cases cited (3)
- Nalongo Nazziwa Josephine v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 2014)
- Col. (Rtd) Dr. Kizza Besigye v Uganda (Criminal Application No. 83 of 2016)
- Lumala David v Uganda (Miscellaneous Application No. 37 of 2016)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.