Tukamusherura James v Attorney General [2016] UGHRC 64
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Uganda Human Rights Commission held that prison warders of Kanungu Prison unlawfully caused the death of Mwebesa Yokana when they took prisoners to work on a rainy day and a pit collapsed, killing him. The death violated his constitutional right to life under Article 22(1). The Respondent was vicariously liable for the actions of its agents. The deceased's family was entitled to compensation of UGX 30,000,000 for the violation of the right to life.
Outcome
Complaint allowed with compensation awarded to the family of the deceased
Facts
On November 7, 2007, Mwebaze Yokana, a prisoner serving his sentence at Kanungu Government Prison, died when prison warders took prisoners to work on a rainy day. While digging a pit, the walls collapsed, covering two prisoners with soil. Mwebaze Yokana suffocated to death. The deceased was 20 years old, a total orphan who left behind two younger brothers aged 16 and 14 years. Prison officials provided no support for burial arrangements. The body was delivered to the complainant's doorstep. A medical certificate confirmed the cause of death as asphyxiation. The Officer-in-Charge of Kanungu Prison, Wardress Ruth Kaahwa, confirmed in her statement that the pit collapsed on the prisoners while they were working, causing them to suffocate.
Issues
- Whether the Respondent's servants/agents violated Mwebesa Yokana's right to life.
- Whether Mwebesa Yokana's family is entitled to compensation.
Orders
- The complaint is allowed.
- The Respondent is ordered to pay the Complainant a sum of UGX 30,000,000 (Thirty Million Shillings).
- The Respondent shall pay costs of these proceedings to the Complainant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Article 22(1)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Article 50
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Article 53(2)(c)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 6
- African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights Article 4
Cases cited (1)
- Akdeniz and Others v Turkey (2001) ECHR 349
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.