Tumwesige Francis v Attorney General (Consitutional Petition No. 36 of 2018)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that the rogue and vagabond offences in Penal Code Act s.168(1)(c) and (d) are void for vagueness and for reversing the presumption of innocence.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Tumwesige Francis applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.