Wakilii
HomeCase law › Turyahabwa v Attorney General and Another (Consitutional Petition 50 of 2017)

Turyahabwa v Attorney General and Another (Consitutional Petition 50 of 2017)

Citation: [2024] UGCC 29 Court: Constitutional Court Decided: 12 August 2024 Jurisdiction: Uganda

Legal issues

Constitutional LawCriminal Law & ProcedureHuman RightsAdministrative LawCivil ProcedureStatutory Interpretation

About this case

AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.

Section 41(1) and (2) of the Anti-Corruption Act, empowering the IGG to require an accused to furnish a sworn asset declaration, does not violate the presumption of innocence.

Ask Wakilii about this case

Get a cited answer on how Turyahabwa applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.

Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.