Wakilii

Tyson Bros. Ltd v Newsome (Civil Case No. 130 of 1928)

East African Court of Appeal · [1928] EACA 7 · 1928 Judgment for Plaintiff AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
First instance civil suit for money lent with defendant failing to enter appearance
Decision
Judgment entered for plaintiff for money lent with interest

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Where a claim is liquidated on the face of the plaint and the defendant has failed to enter an appearance, the Court is not required to go beyond the plaint to discover whether it sets out the full facts of the transaction. The defendant's failure to enter appearance constitutes a virtual abandonment of any defence. Judgment entered for the plaintiff for the liquidated sum with interest as claimed.

Outcome

Judgment entered for plaintiff for money lent with interest

Facts

The plaintiff sued the defendant for Sh. 4,000 being money lent plus interest at an agreed rate. The advance was made pursuant to a verbal arrangement which was confirmed by a letter sent to the defendant. The plaintiff held a receipt from the defendant for Sh. 4,000. The defendant failed to enter an appearance. When the matter came before the Registrar for judgment, the plaintiff's advocate refused to produce either the receipt or the letter of confirmation. The Registrar refused to enter judgment and referred the matter to a Judge.

Issues

  1. Whether the Court is entitled to call for production of documents (receipt and letter) under Order 10 Rule 14 where the claim is liquidated on the face of the plaint.
  2. Whether the Registrar was within his powers to refuse to enter judgment when the plaintiff's advocate refused to produce documents.
  3. Whether the Court should go beyond the face of a liquidated plaint to discover the full facts of a transaction where the defendant has not entered an appearance.

Orders

  • Judgment for the plaintiffs for Sh. 4,000.
  • Interest at 6 per cent from 13th January 1928 to judgment.
  • Interest at 6 per cent on the decree to payment.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Default Judgment — Liquidated Claims — Duty of Court to Investigate
Where a claim is liquidated on the face of the plaint, the Court has no duty to go beyond the plaint to discover whether it sets out the full facts of the transaction.
Civil Procedure — Default Judgment — Effect of Failure to Enter Appearance
A defendant who omits to enter an appearance has virtually abandoned any defence that might exist, and if there is a defence undisclosed in the proofs, the defendant should have entered an appearance.
Evidence — Production of Documents — Registrar's Powers under Order 10 Rule 14
The Registrar is within his powers under Order 10 Rule 14 to call for production of documents and to refuse to enter judgment where a party refuses to produce documents requested by the Court.

Legislation cited (2)

  • Civil Procedure Rules 1927 Order 10 Rule 14
  • Civil Procedure Rules 1927 Order XLVI Rule 2

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Tyson Bros. Ltd v Newsome (Civil Case No. 130 of 1928) [1928] EACA 7 (1 January 1928)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.