Uganda American Insurance Company Limited v Ruganzu (Civil Appeal 10 of 1992)
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 2 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that the presumption that an employee driving the company car acted in the course of employment was rebutted, so the employer was not vicariously liable.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Uganda American Insurance Company Limited applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.