Uganda Investment Authority v Kaguhangire (Miscellaneous Application No. 211 of 2018)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Industrial Court dismissed an application to join a former executive director as a third party in a labour dispute concerning the termination of an employee she had appointed. The court held that the subject matter of the underlying dispute was the lawfulness of the termination, not the circumstances of the appointment, and that the proposed third party had no direct right to indemnity arising from the termination decision.
Outcome
Application for third party notice dismissed
Facts
Uganda Investment Authority (the applicant) sought to join Jolly K. Kaguhangire (the respondent) as a third party to Labour Dispute Reference No. 237/2018, which was brought by Carol Karungi against the applicant. The applicant alleged that the respondent, while serving as their executive, had irregularly appointed Carol Karungi and paid her excessive remuneration. The applicant had directed the respondent to terminate Karungi's contract, but the respondent refused. The respondent was subsequently interdicted, and the applicant terminated Karungi's employment on grounds that her appointment was illegal. Karungi then sued the applicant for unlawful termination. The applicant sought to join the respondent to explain her role in the irregular appointment.
Issues
- Whether the respondent should be joined as a third party to Labour Dispute Reference No. 237/2018 concerning the termination of Carol Karungi.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (3)
- Panyahululu Co. Ltd v New Ocean Transporters Co. Ltd & Others (HCCS No. 523 of 2006)
- D.S.S Motors Ltd v Afri Tours and Travel Ltd (HCCS No. 12 of 2003)
- NBS Television v UBC (HCCS No. 246 of 2012)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.