Uganda Revenue Authority V Ren Publishers Limited & 2 Others (MISC. APPLICATION NO. 510 OF 2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that a court cannot add a party to proceedings for interim protection under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act where the applicant seeking to be added is not a party to the underlying arbitration agreement. Section 9 limits court intervention in arbitration matters. To grant interim measures both parties must be parties to the arbitration agreement; mere commercial connection is insufficient.
Outcome
Application to add party dismissed with costs
Facts
The 1st and 2nd respondents had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding and subcontract with the 3rd respondent in 2014 and 2016 for provision of electronic verification services (UNBS E-tags). A dispute arose and was referred to arbitration in February 2018. In April 2019, the 3rd respondent signed a separate contract with Uganda Revenue Authority and SICPA SA for similar digital tax stamp and conformity services. The 1st and 2nd respondents filed Miscellaneous Cause 171 of 2019 seeking interim orders to restrain the 3rd respondent from implementing the new contract with URA and SICPA pending arbitration. URA then applied to be added as a party, arguing the orders sought would affect its contractual interests under the Framework Contract with SICPA and the 3rd respondent.
Issues
- Whether Uganda Revenue Authority can be added as a party to Miscellaneous Cause No. 171 of 2019 brought under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
- Whether the court has jurisdiction to add a non-party to an arbitration agreement to proceedings seeking interim protection under section 6 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the 1st and 2nd respondents.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Judicature Act s.33
- Civil Procedure Rules O.1 r.10(2)
- Civil Procedure Rules O.52 r.1
- Civil Procedure Rules O.52 r.3
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act s.6
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act s.9
Cases cited (2)
- Usafi Market Vendors Association v Kampala Capital City Authority (Misc. Application No. 647 of 2018)
- City of London v Sancheti [2009] Bus. L.R. 996
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.