Uganda v Abujere Siraji Alias Ashiraf (Criminal Session 283 of 2025)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court acquitted the accused of rape. While the prosecution established that sexual intercourse occurred and that the complainant did not consent, the court found the victim's testimony untruthful regarding whether she was alone at the time of the alleged offence. The victim claimed she was alone, but her mother testified that another person (Emma) was present. The court held it unsafe to convict solely on the victim's uncorroborated evidence where her credibility was compromised, and the prosecution failed to call material witnesses who could have corroborated her account.
Outcome
Accused acquitted and discharged
Facts
On 26 September 2024 at Wano Village, Moyo district, the accused allegedly raped the complainant Tiko Evelyn. The accused had been working for the complainant's mother cutting trees for charcoal. The complainant testified that at around 8:00 pm, when alone at home, the accused kicked down the door, assaulted her by punching and strangling her, and forcefully had sexual intercourse with her. She became unconscious and later fled to a neighbour's house. Medical examination the following day revealed whitish vaginal discharge, red eyes, bruises, and neck scratches. The complainant's mother returned home to find the house disorganized with clothes scattered. The accused denied the allegation, stating he left at 6:00 pm with one Saleh, and that the complainant was at home with another person called Emma who was drinking alcohol.
Issues
- Whether there was sexual intercourse with the complainant.
- Whether there was consent of the complainant to the sexual intercourse.
- Whether the accused was the person who committed the offence.
Orders
- Accused acquitted of the offence of rape.
- Accused ordered to be set free unless held on other lawful charges.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
- Penal Code Act Cap.128 s.110
- Penal Code Act Cap.128 s.111
- Penal Code Act Cap.128 s.116(7)(b)
- Constitution of Uganda Article 28(3)
Cases cited (12)
- Woolmington v DPP (1935) AC 462
- Basita Hussein v Uganda (Supreme Court Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 1995)
- Miller v Minister of Pensions [1947] 2 All ER 372
- Kalinaki v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 507 of 2016)
- John Katuramu v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 1998)
- Abdala Nabulere & Another v Uganda (1979 HCB 77)
- Uganda v Kato Kajubi Godfrey (Criminal Appeal No. 39 of 2010)
- Twongo v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 2028)
- Mayombwe Patrick v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 17 of 2002)
- Okello Geoffrey v Uganda [2014] UGCA
- FRN v Iweka (2011) 11-12 SC (Pt. I) p. 109; (2011) LPELR-9350(SC)
- Inerail Epuku S/o Achietu v R (1934)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.