Uganda v Atugonza (Constitutional Reference No. 31 of 2010)
Treatment recorded in citing cases
followed in 2
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that charging an accused under a re-enacted offence (Anti-Corruption Act s.11, replacing Penal Code s.87) for acts committed before commencement is not retrospective under article 28(7).
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Uganda applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.