Uganda v Katerega.C. (Criminal Session Case No. 51 of 2000) (Criminal Session Case No. 51 of 2000)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The accused was charged with defilement contrary to s.123(1) of the Penal Code. The prosecution proved that the complainant was under 18 and that sexual intercourse occurred, but failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the perpetrator. The accused's alibi was supported by a prosecution witness who confirmed the accused was working at his premises throughout the day. The court acquitted the accused.
Outcome
Accused acquitted and set at liberty
Facts
On 10th June 1998 at about 3 p.m., the complainant, a 12-year-old girl, was allegedly accosted by the accused near his home while proceeding to her grandparents' house. According to her testimony, the accused forcibly took her into his house, secured the bedroom door, removed her underwear, and had sexual intercourse with her. She reported the incident to community members who arrested the accused and took him to police. Medical examination on 11th June showed ruptured hymen (approximately 2 days old), injuries to private parts, and presence of sperms. The accused presented an alibi defence, stating he had been working at a prosecution witness's home from early morning until about 5 p.m. and could not have committed the offence.
Issues
- Whether the complainant was under 18 years of age at the time of the alleged offence.
- Whether the complainant had sexual intercourse on 10th June 1998.
- Whether it was the accused who committed the offence of defilement.
Orders
- The accused is acquitted of the offence of defilement.
- The accused should be set at liberty unless held on any other charge.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Cases cited (2)
- Uganda v Donozio Yiga (Criminal Session Case No. 38 of 1995)
- Chila and Another v Republic [1967] EA 722
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.