Wakilii

Uganda v Kigundu Suleiman (HCT-00-CR-S-C-0007 of 2002) (HCT-00-CR-S-C-0007 of 2002)

High Court · [2002] UGHC 16 · 2002 Conviction Entered AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
First instance criminal trial for murder
Decision
Accused convicted of murder and sentenced to death

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused murdered Kayondo on 25 March 2001. The court rejected the accused's alibi that he was robbed and was not at the scene. Three prosecution witnesses testified that after a dispute over a card game, the accused followed the deceased, struck him on the head with a stick causing fatal injuries. The accused's report to police of a robbery immediately after the incident was found to be a false ploy to evade justice. Convicted and sentenced to death.

Outcome

Accused convicted of murder and sentenced to death

Facts

On 25 March 2001 at approximately 1 a.m., the accused and deceased Kayondo were at a disco at Mpererwe. They were playing matatu (cards) for money. The accused lost and refused to pay, claiming a mistake had been made. Kayondo insisted on payment and boxed the accused. A fight ensued and witnesses Robert Kyagaba and Haruna Lukyamuzi separated them, with Robert taking Kayondo away and Haruna restraining the accused. The accused freed himself, went around the building, picked up a large stick, and followed Kayondo. The accused struck Kayondo on the head with the stick. Kayondo fell, bled from the nose and mouth, and later died at Mulago Hospital. Immediately after the incident, the accused reported to police that he had been robbed by thugs and had grabbed a stick from one of them.

Issues

  1. Whether Kayondo is dead.
  2. Whether Kayondo died of an unlawful act or omission.
  3. Whether the unlawful act or omission was done with malice aforethought.
  4. Whether the accused Kigundu Suleiman committed the unlawful act.

Orders

  • Accused found guilty of murder and convicted.
  • Accused sentenced to death in the manner laid down by law.

Rules and key headnotes

Murder — Elements — Burden of Proof
In a prosecution for murder, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased is dead, that death resulted from an unlawful act or omission, that the unlawful act or omission was done with malice aforethought, and that the accused committed the act. The burden of proof rests on the prosecution throughout and does not shift to the accused.
Alibi — Burden of Proof — Duty of Prosecution
Where an accused raises an alibi, the burden remains on the prosecution to destroy it beyond reasonable doubt. The accused need only create a reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case and is not required to prove the alibi.
Credibility — Assessment of Witnesses — Demeanour
A trial court is entitled to assess the credibility of witnesses by examining their demeanour in the witness box and the manner in which they give testimony. Where witnesses testify in a straightforward manner without prevaricating, the court may accept their evidence as truthful.
Provocation — Cooling-Off Time — Effect on Defence
Provocation does not afford a defence to murder where the accused had ample time to cool down after being provoked before committing the unlawful act.

Legislation cited (2)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Uganda v Kigundu Suleiman (HCT-00-CR-S-C-0007 of 2002) (HCT-00-CR-S-C-0007 of 2002) [2002] UGHC 16 (2 December 2002)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.