Wakilii

Uganda v Kobusingye Gloria and Another (Criminal Session Case 253 of 2019)

High Court · [2025] UGHC 1007 · 2025 Acquittal Entered AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
First instance criminal trial for murder in the High Court
Decision
Accused acquitted and released from custody

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The accused Gakuru John was charged with murder. The prosecution's case rested entirely on a charge and caution statement allegedly made by the accused, which he retracted and claimed was procured through torture. The court held that it was not satisfied the confession was true, particularly given the torture allegations and the absence of independent corroborative evidence. The witness who found the accused's identity card at the scene was not called, and the co-accused who had pleaded guilty was not brought to testify. The court acquitted the accused.

Outcome

Accused acquitted and released from custody

Facts

On the night of 13 March 2019, Katungika John was murdered at Kyakabunga village in Kyotera district. A post-mortem examination revealed the cause of death as suffocation due to strangulation. The deceased's wife, Kobusingye Gloria (A1), was arrested as a suspect following evidence of domestic conflict. A phone tracker revealed extensive communication between Kobusingye and someone in Isingiro. A neighbour found an identity card in the names of Gakuru John at the scene. Gakuru was arrested in a refugee camp in Isingiro, initially denying involvement. Police alleged that Gakuru made a charge and caution statement admitting he had been hired by Kobusingye together with one Haramanzan to kill the deceased for payment. Kobusingye pleaded guilty and was serving her sentence. Gakuru retracted his statement, claiming it was procured through four days of torture at an unknown location before being taken to Kalisizo police station.

Issues

  1. Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that death occurred unlawfully.
  2. Whether the prosecution proved malice aforethought.
  3. Whether the prosecution proved the participation of the accused Gakuru John in the murder.
  4. Whether the retracted confession allegedly made by the accused was true and could ground a conviction.

Orders

  • Accused Gakuru John acquitted of the offence of murder.
  • Accused released from custody forthwith unless lawfully held in connection with some other offence.

Rules and key headnotes

Evidence — Confessions — Retracted Confessions — Standard of Proof
A trial court should accept a retracted or repudiated confession with caution and must, before founding a conviction on such a confession, be fully satisfied in all circumstances of the case that the confession is true, usually requiring corroboration in some material particular by independent evidence, though corroboration is not necessary in law if the court is satisfied after considering all material points and surrounding circumstances that the confession cannot but be true.
Evidence — Confessions — Torture Allegations — Corroboration
Where an accused claims a confession was procured through torture and there is no independent evidence to corroborate the confession, the court will not be satisfied that the confession is true and will not found a conviction upon it.
Criminal Law & Procedure — Murder — Burden of Proof — Weakness of Prosecution Evidence
Where the prosecution's case rests entirely on a retracted confession and material witnesses such as the person who found the accused's identity card at the scene and a co-accused who pleaded guilty are not called to testify, the evidence is too weak to secure a conviction.

Legislation cited (2)

Cases cited (1)

  • Tuwamoi v Uganda [1967] EA 84

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Uganda v Kobusingye Gloria and Another (Criminal Session Case 253 of 2019) [2025] UGHC 1007 (12 September 2025)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.