Uganda v Leo Byamukama and Another (Criminal Session Case No. 160 of 1991)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Director of Public Prosecutions entered a nolle prosequi in respect of both accused persons following the death of the first accused before committal. The court discharged both accused persons under section 133(1) of the Trial on Indictments Act.
Outcome
Both accused persons discharged following entry of nolle prosequi
Facts
Leo Byamukama (accused No.1) and Paul Ssebunya (accused No.2) faced criminal charges. The first accused died before he was committed to the High Court. Following consultation, the Director of Public Prosecutions decided to enter a nolle prosequi in respect of both accused persons rather than proceed with the prosecution. The prosecution sought and obtained an adjournment to obtain the formal nolle prosequi document from Kampala. On 12 March 1993, the prosecution tendered the nolle prosequi signed by the Director of Public Prosecutions and dated 5 March 1993.
Orders
- Nolle prosequi entered by the Director of Public Prosecutions dated 5 March 1993.
- Accused persons discharged under section 133(1) of the Trial on Indictments Act.
- Accused No.2 to be released immediately unless held on other lawful charge.
Legislation cited (1)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.