Wakilii

Uganda v. Lodu Eneriko (Crim. Case No. 0014 Of 2009) (Crim. Case No. 0014 of 2009)

High Court · [2009] UGHC 193 · 2009 Conviction Entered AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
First instance criminal trial for aggravated defilement
Decision
Accused convicted of aggravated defilement and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was 8 years old, that sexual intercourse occurred (slightest penetration being sufficient regardless of intact hymen), and that eyewitness evidence placed the accused at the scene. The defence of alibi was rejected as untrue. Accused convicted of aggravated defilement and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment.

Outcome

Accused convicted of aggravated defilement and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment

Facts

In October 2008 at Kerelu village, Adjumani District, the victim Peace Paula, aged 8 years, went to the accused's house to fetch fire at 1:00 pm. The accused grabbed her, removed his shorts, pulled up her clothes and underpants, and had sexual intercourse with her. Two witnesses, aged 13 and 18, saw the accused carry the victim into his house and later observed through a window the accused on top of the victim with clothes displaced. The victim returned home crying and later complained of pain to her mother, who found blood from the victim's private parts. Medical examination revealed bruised labia majora consistent with sexual force, though the hymen remained intact. The accused, aged 53, denied the charge and claimed he was at casual labour work at the material time.

Issues

  1. Whether the victim was a girl below 14 years of age.
  2. Whether there was penetration or sexual intercourse with the victim.
  3. Whether the accused person participated in commission of the offence.

Orders

  • Accused found guilty of aggravated defilement.
  • Accused convicted accordingly.
  • Accused sentenced to fifteen (15) years imprisonment.

Rules and key headnotes

Age of Victim — Proof in Sexual Offences — Sufficiency of Evidence
In proving the age of a victim of a sexual offence, it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove the exact age of the victim. It is sufficient to prove that the victim was below the statutory age threshold at the time of the offence.
Sexual Offences — Penetration — Slightest Penetration Sufficient
The slightest penetration is sufficient to prove sexual intercourse in a defilement case. It is immaterial that the hymen was found intact because the rupture of the hymen depends on the depth of penetration.
Defence of Alibi — Burden of Disproof on Prosecution
Once an accused person sets up a defence of alibi, the accused has no duty to prove it. The onus is upon the prosecution to disprove the alibi by adducing evidence that places the accused at the scene of crime at the material time.

Legislation cited (2)

Cases cited (1)

  • Muze Imana v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 85 of 1999)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Uganda Vs. Lodu Eneriko (Crim. Case No. 0014 Of 2009) (Crim. Case No. 0014 of 2009) [2009] UGHC 193 (3 November 2009)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.