Uganda v Moses Okello (High Court No. 120 of 1991)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court held that a default sentence of 5 months imprisonment for a fine of shs. 5000/= was illegal. The Magistrates Courts Act 1970 s.192(d) as amended by Act 4 of 1985 fixes the maximum default sentence for a fine exceeding shs. 2000/= but not exceeding shs. 10,000/= at 1 month. The illegal default sentence was set aside and substituted with a lawful default sentence of 1 month imprisonment.
Outcome
Default sentence corrected to comply with statutory maximum
Facts
Moses Okello was charged with disobedience of lawful order contrary to s.111 of the Penal Code Act. On 18 December 1990, he allegedly disobeyed a police stop order at a road block in Kitgum town when he drove motor vehicle Reg. No. UPJ 404 into the road block. He pleaded guilty and was convicted. The Magistrate sentenced him to a fine of shs. 5000/= or in default 5 months imprisonment. The Chief Magistrate of Gulu forwarded the file to the High Court seeking revision, complaining that the default sentence was illegal.
Issues
- Whether the default sentence of 5 months imprisonment for a fine of shs. 5000/= was illegal.
Orders
- Default sentence of 5 months imprisonment set aside.
- Default sentence of 1 month imprisonment substituted in its place.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Penal Code Act s.111
- Magistrates Courts Act 1970 s.192(d)
- Magistrates Courts Act Amendment Act 4 of 1985
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.