Uganda v Odong (Criminal Session Case 265 of 1996)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Accused pleaded guilty to manslaughter after killing his son during a drunken quarrel. Sentenced to 3 years imprisonment, taking into account first offender status, 1.5 years pre-trial custody, and domestic responsibilities, but condemning resolution of disputes by violence.
Outcome
Accused convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment
Facts
The accused visited his son's home and they drank enguli together from morning until 9:00 p.m. When the accused requested a place to sleep, the deceased refused and insisted he return to his own home. A drunken quarrel ensued. The accused picked up his spear and started leaving while quarreling. The deceased followed him armed with a stick. A fight resulted. The accused threw his spear, which struck the deceased in the right groin. The deceased removed the spear and speared the accused in the back. Both were taken to Gulu Hospital. The deceased died a week later from peritonitis with septic shock. The accused recovered after treatment. The accused was originally indicted for murder but pleaded guilty to manslaughter, which plea was accepted by the prosecution.
Issues
- What is the appropriate sentence for manslaughter arising from a drunken quarrel between father and son?
Orders
- Accused convicted of manslaughter contrary to section 182 of the Penal Code Act.
- Accused sentenced to 3 years imprisonment.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.