Uganda v Okello (High Court Criminal Revision 120 of 1991)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that a default sentence of 5 months imprisonment for a fine of shs. 5,000/= was illegal. The Magistrates Courts Act s.192(d) as amended by Act 4/1985 fixes the maximum default sentence for a fine exceeding shs. 2,000/= but not exceeding shs. 10,000/= at 1 month. The illegal default sentence was set aside and substituted with a default sentence of 1 month imprisonment.
Outcome
Illegal default sentence corrected to comply with statutory maximum
Facts
Moses Okello was charged with disobedience of lawful order contrary to section 111 of the Penal Code Act. He was alleged to have disobeyed a stop order given by the Police at a road block on 18 December 1990 when he drove Motor Vehicle Reg. No. UPJ 404 into the road block within Kitgum town. He pleaded guilty and was convicted. He was sentenced to a fine of shs. 5,000/= or in default 5 months imprisonment. The Chief Magistrate of Gulu forwarded the file to the High Court seeking a revision order on grounds that the default sentence was illegal.
Issues
- Whether the default sentence of 5 months imprisonment for a fine of shs. 5,000/= was illegal.
Orders
- Default sentence of 5 months imprisonment set aside.
- Default sentence of 1 month imprisonment substituted in its place.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.