Wakilii

Union Nationale Des Syndicate Autonomes Du Senegal v Senegal (Communication 226 of 1999)

African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights · [2000] ACHPR 28 · 2000 Communication Inadmissible AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Communication to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights alleging violations of the African Charter
Decision
Communication dismissed for failure to exhaust domestic remedies

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights declared the communication inadmissible under Article 56(5) of the African Charter. Although the communication presented a prima facie case of violations of the Charter, the Commission found that the complainant had not exhausted all available domestic remedies. The Secretary General of UNSAS had appealed his conviction and the appeal process remained pending.

Outcome

Communication dismissed for failure to exhaust domestic remedies

Facts

UNSAS, a Senegalese trade union congress, alleged that on 20 July 1998 the Senegalese government arrested Mr. Mademba Sock, Secretary General of UNSAS and SUTELEC, along with 25 other union members. The detainees were held for four days without access to counsel or family. UNSAS alleged violations of labour freedoms and the right to defence. The Special Regional Court of Dakar acquitted the accused on charges of damaging electrical installations but convicted Mr. Sock of acts likely to compromise public security and sentenced him to six months imprisonment. After serving his sentence including pre-trial detention, Mr. Sock was released on 23 January 1999. Mr. Sock had filed an appeal against the conviction which remained pending at the time of the Commission's consideration.

Issues

  1. Whether the communication should be declared admissible where domestic remedies have not been exhausted.

Orders

  • Communication declared inadmissible.

Rules and key headnotes

Human Rights — Admissibility — Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies
A communication to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights will be declared inadmissible under Article 56(5) of the African Charter where the complainant has not exhausted all available domestic remedies, even where the communication presents a prima facie case of Charter violations.

Legislation cited (3)

  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 56(5)
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 10
  • Senegalese Penal Code Section 80

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Union Nationale Des Syndicate Autonomes Du Senegal v Senegal (Communication 226 of 1999) [2000] ACHPR 28 (6 November 2000)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.