Volcano Coffee Limited and Another v Infinite Aromas Company Limited (Miscellaneous Application 2345 of 2025)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court held that a party who has duly instructed and facilitated counsel cannot be held liable for counsel's negligence or non-appearance. Following established case law that mistakes of counsel should not be visited upon the litigant, the court set aside both the dismissal order of the interlocutory application and the default judgment in the main suit, reinstating both matters to be heard on their merits.
Outcome
Dismissal order and default judgment set aside; matters reinstated for hearing on merits
Facts
The respondent filed Civil Suit No. 0014 of 2025 against the applicants by specially endorsed plaint. The 2nd applicant filed Misc. Application No. 0378 of 2025 seeking unconditional leave to appear and defend. That application was dismissed for non-appearance of counsel, and as a result, default judgment was entered in the main suit in favor of the respondent. The 2nd applicant then filed this application seeking to set aside both the dismissal order and the default judgment. Evidence showed that the applicant had instructed and paid facilitation to counsel, who failed to attend court. The applicant argued this was counsel's mistake, not the client's fault.
Issues
- Whether the applicant raises sufficient grounds for an order setting aside the dismissal order of Misc. Application No. 0378 of 2025 and the same be reinstated.
- Whether the default judgement in Civil Suit No. 0014 of 2025 should be set aside.
Orders
- The Order dismissing Misc. Application No. 0378 of 2025 is hereby set aside.
- Misc. Application No. 0378 of 2025 is hereby reinstated and will be heard on its merits.
- Default judgement entered in Civil Suit No. 0014 of 2025 is hereby set aside.
- Costs shall abide the cause.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
Cases cited (2)
- Godfrey Magezi and Others v Sudhir Ruparelia (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 10 of 2002)
- Misc. Application No. 2399 of 2025 between the same parties
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.