Wallington v Wallington and Another (Divorce Cause No. 29 of 1941)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Where a petitioner applies to withdraw or dismiss a divorce petition before the respondent has entered an appearance, the court may grant the dismissal. The dismissal does not terminate the proceedings in the sense that it does not bar the petitioner from instituting a new suit making the same allegations.
Outcome
Petition dismissed with liberty to file new petition alleging same charges
Facts
The petitioner filed a divorce petition. The respondent was served but did not enter an appearance. The co-respondent was not served. The petitioner applied for permission to withdraw the petition or have it dismissed, with leave to file a new petition in future alleging the same charges together with any new matter.
Issues
- Whether a petitioner may withdraw or have dismissed a divorce petition where the respondent has not entered an appearance.
- What are the consequences of dismissal of a divorce petition in such circumstances.
Orders
- Petition dismissed.
- Dismissal does not have the effect of terminating the proceedings.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (1)
- Hall v Hall and Richardson (1879) L.J. P. 57
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.