Walugembe Charles and Another v Natalia Nandawula and 2 Others (Civil Suit No. 79 of 2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court held that the lower part of the disputed kibanja belonged to the estate of the Late Nakuya Marcerina. The defendants, as administrators of another estate, had no lawful authority to distribute or deal with Nakuya's portion of the land. Their registration and distribution of that portion was declared illegal and void ab initio. A permanent injunction was granted restraining further intermeddling with the estate.
Outcome
Plaintiffs' claims granted; declarations made; permanent injunction issued; no damages awarded given family reconciliation considerations under Article 126 of the Constitution
Facts
The plaintiffs, administrators of the estate of the Late Nakuya Marcerina (died 1982), sued for declarations that defendants were not administrators of her estate and had illegally dealt with a kibanja at Kalagala-Kiteredde, Masaka. Plaintiffs claimed Nakuya obtained the kibanja from Pokino and later gifted the upper part to her son Ganafa (father of the 2nd defendant) upon his marriage in 1949, while she retained and resided on the lower part. Defendants claimed Ganafa received the entire kibanja from Buganda Kingdom as a World War 2 veteran. After obtaining letters of administration to Ganafa's estate in 2014, defendants distributed the entire kibanja among Ganafa's beneficiaries and registered it with Buganda Land Board. Under cross-examination, defendant witnesses admitted that Nakuya had lived in her own house on the lower part of the kibanja. Buganda Land Board's dispute resolution committee recognized Nakuya's ownership of part of the land.
Issues
- Whether the suit land forms part of the estate of the Late Nakuya Marcerina?
- Whether the Defendants have committed any fraud or illegalities in respect to the suit land?
- What remedies are available to the parties?
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the Plaintiffs and against the Defendants.
- Declaration that the Defendants are not the Administrators of the estate of the Late Nakuya Marcerina.
- Declaration that the Defendants illegally and fraudulently intermeddled in the suit kibanja situate at Kalagala-Kiteredde Lcl Butego Parish, Katwe Butego - Masaka Municipality belonging to the Late Nakuya Marcerina.
- Order for cancellation of registration of land belonging to the estate of the Late Nakuya Marcerina illegally registered by the Defendants.
- A permanent injunction issues restraining the Defendants from further purported administration, intermeddling and dealing in the estate of the Late Nakuya Marcerina.
- Each party to bear its own costs of the suit.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
Cases cited (4)
- George William Kakoma v Attorney General [2010] HCB 1
- Sebuliba v Cooperative Bank Ltd [1982] HCB 130
- Oketha v Attorney General (Civil Suit No. 0069 of 2004)
- Muluta Joseph v Katarna Sylvano (Civil Appeal No. 11 of 1999)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.