Walusimbi Mansur V Uganda (Crim. Misc. Application No. 09 of 2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court granted bail pending appeal to a convict sentenced to 22 months. The court exercised its discretion having found that the applicant satisfied most conditions for bail, including being a first offender, having committed a non-violent offence, and providing four sureties. The court held that despite the conviction, the presumption of innocence prevails until final appeal, justifying temporary release on bail.
Outcome
Applicant released on bail pending appeal subject to conditions
Facts
The applicant, Walusimbi Mansur, was convicted and sentenced to 22 months imprisonment. He appealed the conviction and filed this application for bail pending appeal. He presented four sureties in support of his application, including two wives. He resides at Water Supply Ward, Busoigo Zone North Division, Kamuli Municipality, Kamuli District. The State opposed the application, arguing it was purely discretionary and that the sureties were of different addresses, making it difficult to ensure the applicant's attendance. The State contended that if bail were granted, it should be on stringent terms.
Issues
- Whether the applicant should be granted bail pending appeal.
Orders
- Application for bail pending appeal allowed.
- Applicant to deposit cash bail of Shs. 500,000 before release.
- Each of the four sureties to execute non-cash bonds of Shs. 1,200,000.
- Applicant to report to the Registrar every 15th day of the month with effect from 15th May 2019.
- Bail shall be cancelled and applicant returned to serve sentence if any bail term is abused.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (2)
- Chandi Jamwa v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 2011)
- Arvind Patel v Uganda (SCCA No. 1 of 2013)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.