Wamala Realty Limited v G7 Prime Limited (Miscellaneous Application No. 2162 of 2025)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court granted leave to amend the written statement of defence to add salient facts and include a counterclaim. The court held that despite inordinate delay, the amendment was necessary to determine all issues in controversy and avoid multiplicity of suits. The fact that an amendment introduces a new cause of action is not grounds for refusal. Any prejudice to the respondent could be compensated by costs. The applicant was ordered to file the amended pleading within fifteen days.
Outcome
Application granted with directions for filing amended pleadings
Facts
The Respondent filed Civil Suit No. 670 of 2023 on 21 July 2023 claiming the Applicant owed UGX 373,318,112 for construction works. The Applicant filed its written statement of defence on 18 August 2023. The Applicant's current lawyers took over conduct of the matter on 29 April 2025 from M/s MSN Advocates. On 24 September 2025, the Applicant filed this application seeking leave to amend its defence to add salient facts about the construction contract and include a counterclaim for UGX 350,000,000 for breach of contract and substandard work. The Respondent opposed the application as being filed two years late and in bad faith. The Respondent itself had filed Miscellaneous Application No. 2474 of 2025 on 1 November 2025 seeking to add six parties and amend the plaint.
Issues
- Whether the Applicant should be granted leave to amend its written statement of defence in Civil Suit No. 670 of 2023?
- What remedies are available to the parties?
Orders
- The Applicant is granted leave to amend the written statement of defence in Civil Suit No. 670 of 2023 by adding the omitted salient facts and including the counterclaim.
- The Applicant shall file and serve its amended written statement of defence and counterclaim within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Ruling.
- The Respondent shall file and serve its reply to the amended written statement of defence and counterclaim within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of the amended written statement of defence and the counterclaim.
- Costs of the application shall be in the cause.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
Cases cited (11)
- Oriental Insurance Brokers Limited v Transocean (U) Limited (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 55 of 1995)
- Gaso Transport Services (Bus) Ltd v Martin Adala Obene (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 4 of 1994)
- Namusisi Yozefina v David Kikaawa (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 1595 of 2018)
- Kayinga Gerald v Muwanga Livingstone & Others (Civil Suit No. 59 of 2025)
- Nabugabo Updeal JV v Bin IT Services Limited (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 297 of 2018)
- Kasozi Joseph & Another v The Registered Trustees of Kampala Archdiocese (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 905 of 2021)
- Eastern Bakery v Castelino [1958] 1 EA 461
- N. Ashah & Co. Ltd v Mulowooza & Brother Ltd & Another (Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 57 of 2009)
- Kensville Ltd v Nakaibale Victoria (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 197 of 2023)
- Mukalazi Samuel Bulukusa v Nansubuga Hanifah (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 126 of 2025)
- Phoenix of Uganda Assurance Co. Ltd v Kuti Investments Ltd & Another (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 679 of 2023)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.