Wanjiko Ssedugge v Nanyonga (Miscellaneous Application 987 of 2023)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Where a plaintiff dies before final determination of a suit and the cause of action survives, section 222 of the Succession Act permits grant of letters of administration ad litem limited to the suit. The court granted the applicant, the deceased plaintiff's widow and co-executor, letters of administration ad litem limited to prosecuting the pending land suit. The applicant was substituted as plaintiff with leave to amend the plaint, but was restricted from executing any consent judgment or out-of-court settlement without consulting estate beneficiaries or obtaining further court orders.
Outcome
Letters of administration ad litem granted to applicant limited to prosecution of the main suit with conditions
Facts
Paulino Ssedugge died on 4 June 2021 while Civil Suit No. 259 of 2014 was ongoing, with the defendant's evidence still being heard. The applicant is the deceased's sole widow, having married him on 6 May 2005. She was appointed co-executor of his estate under a will dated 20 March 2020 and is a beneficiary entitled to the suit property which was bequeathed to her and her children. An application for letters of probate is pending in the Family Division (Probate and Administration Cause No. 842 of 2022) but has been delayed by issues with obtaining a death certificate and objections from the deceased's son. The applicant sought letters of administration ad litem to continue prosecuting the main suit.
Issues
- Whether letters of administration ad litem should be granted to the applicant limited to prosecuting the main suit.
- Whether leave should be granted to substitute the applicant as the plaintiff in place of the deceased plaintiff.
- Whether leave should be granted to amend the plaint to reflect the substitution.
Orders
- The applicant is hereby substituted as the plaintiff in the main suit.
- The applicant shall amend the plaint to indicate the substitution and file the same within fourteen days of this ruling.
- The applicant is not authorised to execute any consent judgment or out of court settlement unless and until she has fully consulted with the beneficiaries of the estate, with the authority of the administrators of the estate, or until further orders are made by this court.
- No orders as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (6)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.