Wasswa v Army for Africa Limited and 2 Others (Civil Suit No. 127 of 2020)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that a civil suit does not abate where the matter has been referred to mediation under the Judicature (Mediation) Rules, as mediation falls within the exception in Order 11A rule 4(e) of the Civil Procedure Rules for cases referred to an official referee or arbitrator. A mediator performs the function of an official referee by hearing parties and reporting to court. The plaintiff is not required to take out summons for directions during mediation.
Outcome
Preliminary objection dismissed; matter to proceed to hearing on merit after proper service on all defendants
Facts
The Plaintiff sued for declarations of ownership of land comprised in Kyaggwe Block 293 Plot 422, claiming trespass by the 1st Defendant who constructed on the land under a freehold title issued by the 2nd Defendant. The Plaintiff claimed to have purchased the land in 2000/2001 with his brother and registered it under mailo tenure in 2011. The 1st Defendant claimed to have purchased the same land from Nafula Rose in 2018 and obtained a freehold certificate in 2019. When the matter came for hearing on 25 October 2021, the 1st Defendant raised a preliminary objection that the suit had abated because the Plaintiff failed to take out summons for directions within 28 days of filing the reply to the defence on 26 February 2021. The Plaintiff's counsel responded that the matter had been referred to mediation on 12 November 2020, which constituted an exception to the summons requirement.
Issues
- Whether the suit abated for failure to take out summons for directions within 28 days from the date of the last reply or rejoinder.
- Whether there are any remedies available where a suit abates.
Orders
- Preliminary objection overruled.
- Suit has not abated.
- Service of hearing notice to be made on the Defendants for the case to be heard on merit.
- Proper service of court process to be done on the 3rd Defendant before Order 9 rule 10 procedure can apply.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (8)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 11A rule 2
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 11A rule 3
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 11A rule 4(e)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 11A rule 6
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 11A rule 1(7)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 8 rule 18(5)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 9 rule 10
- Judicature (Mediation) Rules No. 10 of 2013
Cases cited (2)
- MA No. 150 of 2020 Ahumuza Bageine a.k.a Tash
- Kagimu Moses Gava & others v Sekatawa Muhammed & others (Misc Appeal No. 25 of 2020)
Cases citing this judgment (6)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
- Kireju and Others v Kahwa and Others (HCT-01-LD-MA-0043-2025)
- Bamanyisa and 156 Others v National Forestry Authority (HCT-01-LD-CS 27 of 2020)
- Katuntu and 2 Others v Kankya and 22 Others (Civil Suit No. 36 of 2021)
- Mayanja and 7 Others v Wantante and 5 Others (Civil Suit No. 497 of 2018)
- Mayanja and 7 Others v Wantante and 5 Others (Land Civil Suit No. 497 of 2018)
- Asaba and Another ( Administrators of the estate of the late Rwaheru Akiiki) v Kafeero and Another (Miscellaneous Application No. 2004 of 2021)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.