Wepukhulu Nyunguli v Uganda [2003] UGSC 12
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Mulenga JSC, dissenting, held that penetration was not proved beyond reasonable doubt in a defilement charge and would have substituted a conviction for indecent assault.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Wepukhulu Nyunguli applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.