West Nile Teachers Savings & Credit Coperative Society v Tabu (Civil Suit No. 0001 of 2011)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the leasehold title to the contested property expired by operation of law two years after the Minister dealt with it in 1997, meaning the lease finally expired on 3 July 1999. The plaintiff lacked locus standi to sue as owner of expired leasehold property. Further, the plaintiff's registration was procured by fraud, having knowingly represented a deceased person (Agotre Charles, who died in 1989) as a joint purchaser throughout the transaction to gain advantage. Both suit and counterclaim dismissed as neither party established lawful claim to land now vested in the Arua District Land Board.
Outcome
Both suit and counterclaim dismissed. The contested land vests in the Arua District Land Board in trust for the citizens, with neither party establishing lawful claim to it.
Facts
The plaintiff and Agotre Charles were tenants on a commercial building managed by the Departed Asians Property Custodian Board (DAPCB). Agotre Charles died in 1989. His brother Wadria Charles assumed the tenancy. In 1995, DAPCB advertised the property for sale. The plaintiff and Wadria Charles presented a joint bid in the names of the plaintiff and the deceased Agotre Charles, based on advice to name a sitting tenant. They won the bid with a purchase price of UGX 11,155,000. Wadria Charles contributed only UGX 1,500,000 and later requested a refund, which the plaintiff paid on 4 August 2000. The defendant, Agotre Charles' son and administrator of his estate, forcefully took possession of part of the building claiming it belonged to his late father's estate. A certificate of purchase and title were issued in the joint names of the plaintiff and the deceased Agotre Charles as tenants in common.
Issues
- Whether the plaintiff is the owner of the suit land.
- Whether the defendant is a trespasser on the plaintiff's land.
- What remedies are available to the parties?
Orders
- Both the suit and the counterclaim are dismissed.
- Each party to bear its own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (13)
- Registration of Titles Act s.59
- Registration of Titles Act s.77
- Registration of Titles Act s.176(b)
- Registration of Titles Act s.190(1)
- Assets of Departed Asians Act Cap 83 s.2
- Assets of Departed Asians Act Cap 83 s.3
- Expropriated Properties Act Cap 87 s.2(2)(b)
- Expropriated Properties (Repossession and Disposal) (No.1) Regulations S.I. 87-8 regulation 13
- Public Lands Act 1969
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 Article 286
- Land Act Cap 227 s.59(1)(c)
- Land Act Cap 227 s.59(8)
- Succession Act s.192
Cases cited (8)
- Re Crowhurst Park [1974] 1 WLR 583
- Dr Adeodanta Kekitiinwa and three others v Edward Maudo Wakida (Civil Appeal No. 3 of 2007)
- Makula International Ltd v His Eminence Cardinal Nsubuga and Another [1982] HCB 11
- Kampala Bottlers Limited v Damanico (U) Limited (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 22 of 1992)
- Waimiha Saw Milling Co Ltd v Waione Timber Co Ltd [1926] AC 101
- Frederick Zaabwe v Orient Bank and five others (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2006)
- Kampala District Land Board and another v Venansio Babweyaka and others (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 2 of 2007)
- Imelda Ndiwalungi Nakedde v Roy Busulwa Nsereko and another [1997] HCB 73
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.