XYZ v Benin (Application for Provisional Measures No. 002-2019) (Application 57 of 2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights dismissed an application for provisional measures seeking to stay execution of a Benin court judgment that imposed electoral ineligibility on a former presidential candidate. The Court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate extreme gravity, urgency, or risk of irreparable harm, and noted that under Benin law the judgment was already stayed pending appeal.
Outcome
Application for provisional measures dismissed unanimously
Facts
A Benin national filed an application for provisional measures against Benin, requesting the Court to stay execution of a judgment of the Cotonou Court of First Instance dated 2 August 2019. That judgment had convicted former Prime Minister Lionel Zinsou of forgery and exceeding campaign expense limits in the 2016 presidential election, sentencing him to five years of electoral ineligibility, six months suspended imprisonment, and a fine of 50 million CFA Francs. The applicant, who requested anonymity, claimed the prosecution was designed to prevent Zinsou from contesting the 2021 presidential election, thereby limiting the applicant's right to vote for the candidate of his choice. Zinsou's counsel had filed an appeal on 6 August 2019. The Respondent State argued that under Benin's Criminal Procedure Code, the judgment was automatically stayed upon filing of the appeal, rendering the request for provisional measures irrelevant.
Issues
- Whether the Court has prima facie jurisdiction to hear the application for provisional measures.
- Whether the conditions for granting provisional measures under Article 27(2) of the Protocol have been met, namely extreme gravity, urgency, and risk of irreparable harm to persons.
Orders
- Application for provisional measures dismissed.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (9)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 27(2)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 34(6)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 5(3)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 3(1)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 7(1)(d)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 13(1)
- Rules of Court Rule 51(1)
- Code of Criminal Procedure Article 577
- Constitution of Benin Article 122
Cases cited (2)
- African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights v Libya (Application No. 002/2013)
- Amini Juma v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 024/2016)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.