Wakilii

Yeremiya Kayise v Wasula Samuel and Buganda Land Board (Civil Suit 51 of 2025)

High Court · [2025] UGHC 381 · 2025 Counter Claim Allowed (Partially) AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Counterclaim arising from dismissed civil suit for recovery of land
Decision
Counter claim succeeded against first counter defendant; dismissed against second counter defendant. Declaration issued that land belongs to counter claimant with orders for transfer of certificate of title.

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that where a son donated a kibanja to his father who took physical possession, the gift was effective under customary law. The son acted fraudulently by subsequently obtaining a certificate of title to the kibanja in 2018, defeating the father's rights. The Buganda Land Board was not party to the fraud as it was unaware of the earlier gift. A declaration issued that the land belonged to the father.

Outcome

Counter claim succeeded against first counter defendant; dismissed against second counter defendant. Declaration issued that land belongs to counter claimant with orders for transfer of certificate of title.

Facts

In January 2008, Wasula Samuel donated to his father Yeremiya Kayise a house and plot (kibanja) on Buganda Land Board land at Kiwogozi-Kasana Luwero. The donation was recorded in a deed dated 29 January 2008. Kayise took physical possession, completed construction of the house, and built a perimeter wall and gate. In 2009, Kayise donated the property to his daughter Lydia. In 2015, Wasula destroyed the perimeter wall, and it emerged he had obtained a leasehold certificate of title to the same land (Block 652 Plot 959) in his own name in 2018. The counterclaim alleged fraudulent acquisition of title. The original plaintiff's suit (Civil Suit 325 of 2016) was dismissed for want of prosecution in 2022.

Issues

  1. Whether the first counter defendant obtained title fraudulently
  2. What remedies are available

Orders

  • The counter claim against the first counter defendant Wasula Samuel succeeds.
  • The counter claim against the second counter defendant is dismissed.
  • A declaration is issued that Block 652 Plot 959 is the property of Kayesi Yeremiya.
  • The first counter defendant Wasula Samuel shall hand over the duplicate certificate of title for leasehold Volume 4637 Folio 7 on Block 652 Plot 959 to Kayesi Yeremiya within twenty-one days from the date of this order.
  • Upon failure to hand over the certificate of title, the Registrar of Titles is directed to cancel the certificate of title in Walusa's possession and issue another duplicate certificate to Kayise Yeremiya once twenty-one days have lapsed from the date of this order.
  • The counter claimant Yeremiya shall pay the second counter defendant Buganda Land Board costs of the counter claim.
  • The first counter defendant Wasula Samuel shall pay the counter claimant Kayise costs of this counterclaim.

Rules and key headnotes

Customary Land Tenure — Gifts of Kibanja — Requirements for Validity
A gift inter vivos of land held under customary tenure is effective once the donor intends to give the gift and exclusive possession is taken by the donee, which suffices as evidence of the gift and acceptance. Registration with URSB is not required for gifts of kibanja on Kabaka's land governed by customary law.
Fraud — Obtaining Title to Defeat Prior Gift — Customary Land
Where a donor of a kibanja subsequently obtains legal title to the same land after the donee has taken physical possession, the donor acts fraudulently to defeat the gift. The court will issue a declaration that the land belongs to the donee and order transfer of the certificate of title.
Buganda Land Board — Processing of Leases — Liability for Fraud
Where the Buganda Land Board processes a legal interest in a kibanja without knowledge of a prior gift by the applicant, the Board is not party to fraud and cannot be faulted for issuing legal title.
Standard of Proof — Fraud in Civil Cases
The standard of proof in civil cases where fraud is pleaded is slightly higher than the standard in ordinary civil cases but it is not as high as beyond reasonable doubt. A civil court considering a charge of fraud will require a higher degree of probability commensurate with the occasion.

Legislation cited (2)

Cases cited (2)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Yeremiya Kayise v Wasula Samuel and Buganda Land Board (Civil Suit 51 of 2025) [2025] UGHC 381 (10 March 2025)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.