Yogogombaye v Senegal (File No. 001-2008)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights held that it has no jurisdiction to hear an application brought directly by an individual against a State Party that has not made the declaration prescribed in Article 34(6) of the Protocol accepting the Court's competence to receive cases from individuals. Senegal had not made such a declaration, and therefore the Court could not entertain the application. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.
Outcome
Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Facts
Mr. Michelot Yogogombaye, a Chadian national, brought an application against Senegal seeking suspension of proceedings instituted by Senegal to charge, try, and sentence Mr. Hissein Habré, former Head of State of Chad, who was residing in Dakar as a political refugee. The Applicant alleged that Senegal violated the principle of non-retroactivity of criminal law and the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights by amending its Constitution in July 2008 to allow retroactive application of criminal laws to try Habré. The Applicant sought an order suspending the proceedings and establishing a Truth, Justice, Reparations and Reconciliation Commission. Senegal objected to the Court's jurisdiction, asserting it had not made the declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol accepting the Court's competence to receive applications from individuals.
Issues
- Whether the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights has jurisdiction to hear an application brought directly by an individual against a State Party that has not made the declaration prescribed in Article 34(6) of the Protocol accepting the competence of the Court to receive cases from individuals.
Orders
- The Court has no jurisdiction to hear the case instituted by Mr. Yogogombaye against Senegal.
- Each party shall bear its own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 3
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 5(3)
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 22
- Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 34(6)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 7(2)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.