Zirinkomyawo Ibrahim v Nakkonde Agnes (Miscellaneous Cause 173 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Application for eviction dismissed under Order 9 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Rules for non-appearance of both parties on the scheduled hearing date. No order as to costs.
Outcome
Application dismissed for non-appearance
Facts
The applicant sought an eviction order against the respondent from part of land comprised on Block 32, Plot 424 at Mutundwe. The application was scheduled for hearing on 2nd April 2026 at 3:00pm. A hearing notice was issued and uploaded on ECCMIS on 24th February 2026. On the scheduled hearing date, neither the applicant and his lawyers nor the respondent and her lawyers appeared in court.
Issues
- Whether the application should be dismissed where neither party appeared on the scheduled hearing date.
Orders
- Application dismissed under Order 9, Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Rules SI 71-1 for non-appearance of the parties on the date when the application was fixed for hearing.
- No order for costs.
Legislation cited (4)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.