Zone Four International Limited & Another v Euro Cargo Aviation (Miscellaneous Application 1315 of 2023)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the deponent of the Respondent's affidavit in reply had a conflict of interest arising from his firm's former role as company secretary to the Applicant, and the affidavit was struck off. The court found a triable issue as to whether the loan proceeds were actually received by the Applicant, since the money was wired to Zone Four International LLC while the loan agreement named Zone Four International Limited as borrower. Leave to appear and defend was granted.
Outcome
Applicants granted leave to appear and defend; matter to proceed to trial
Facts
The Respondent filed a summary suit (Civil Suit No. 688 of 2023) claiming USD 230,000 allegedly loaned to the Applicants in January 2022. The Respondent claimed that on 4 January 2022, it lent USD 250,000 to the Applicants for six months at no interest, and that the Applicants paid USD 20,000 but failed to pay the balance of USD 230,000. The Applicants denied indebtedness and sought unconditional leave to appear and defend. The Applicants contended that the loan agreement named Zone Four International Limited as borrower but the money was wired to a Bank of America account belonging to Zone Four International LLC, not to the Applicant company. The Applicants also raised a preliminary objection that the Respondent's lawyers had a conflict of interest because the deponent of the affidavit in reply was from CR Amanya Advocates & Solicitors, which had previously served as company secretary to the 1st Applicant.
Issues
- Whether the Respondent's lawyers have a conflict of interest that disqualifies them from representing the Respondent.
- Whether the Applicants should be granted unconditional leave to appear and defend Civil Suit No. 688 of 2023.
Orders
- The Affidavit in Reply deponed by Kamanzi Derrick is struck off.
- The Applicants are granted leave to appear and defend Civil Suit No. 688 of 2023.
- The Applicants shall file their written statement of defence within 15 days from the date of this Ruling.
- Costs shall follow the cause.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 36 Rule 3
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 52 Rules 1 and 3
- Advocates (Professional Conduct) Regulations SI 267-2 Regulation 4
- Partnership Act
Cases cited (4)
- Makula Interglobal Trade Agency v Bank of Uganda [1985] HCB 65
- Geoffrey Gatete & Another v William Kyobe (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 7 of 2005)
- Uganda v Patricia Ojangole (Criminal Case No. 1 of 2014) [2014] UGHCACD 3
- Postal Corporation of Kenya v Inamdar & 2 Others [2004] 7 KLR 359
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.