Cairo Bank Uganda Limited v Hualong Energy Company Limited [2023] UGCOMMC 322
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Where a mortgagor and debtor default on loan repayment obligations secured by both mortgage over land and debenture over movable property, and the secured creditor has complied with statutory notice requirements under the Mortgage Act and Security Interest in Movable Property Act, the court will grant an order for vacant possession to facilitate enforcement by sale where the debtor has ignored multiple demands and there is risk of breach of peace.
Outcome
Applicant granted vacant possession of mortgaged land and charged movable property to facilitate enforcement by sale
Facts
Cairo Bank Uganda Limited advanced a loan facility of UGX 5,000,000,000 to Hualong Energy Company Limited, secured by a mortgage over land comprised in LRV 4474 Folio 8 at Lungala, Mpigi District, and a debenture over plant and machinery for recycling engine oil. The mortgage deed was executed on 11 June 2019 and registered as an encumbrance on 9 January 2020. The debenture was executed on 13 June 2019 and registered with the Registrar of Companies on 30 January 2020. The respondent defaulted with an outstanding balance of UGX 1,336,318,319 accruing interest at 19% per annum. The bank issued a notice of default on 25 November 2022 requiring payment within 45 days, a demand notice on 6 February 2023 requiring payment within 7 days, a notice of sale, and advertised the property in the Daily Monitor on 14 March 2023. The bank wrote requesting vacant possession on 20 March 2023. The respondent did not respond to any notices and did not appear in court. The bank sought court orders for vacant possession to facilitate inspection by prospective buyers and enforcement by sale.
Issues
- Whether an order to take over vacant possession should be granted to the applicant bank to facilitate enforcement of mortgage and debenture securities
Orders
- Vacant possession granted in favor of the Applicant concerning land and developments comprised in LRV 4474, Folio 8 at Lungala Mpigi District.
- Costs of this Application to be borne by the Respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (17)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 52 rules 1 & 3
- Judicature Act s.20(d)
- Judicature Act s.24(1)
- Judicature Act s.24(2)
- Judicature Act s.44(1)
- Judicature Act s.33
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.44(1)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.44(2)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.44(3)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.44(4)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.44(5)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.47
- Mortgage Act s.19(1)
- Mortgage Act s.19(2)
- Mortgage Act s.20(d)
- Mortgage Act s.20(e)
- Mortgage Act s.26
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.