Cairo Bank Uganda Limited v Hualong Energy Company Limited (Miscellaneous Cause 39 of 2023)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that where a secured creditor has complied with statutory notice requirements under the Mortgage Act and the Security Interest in Movable Property Act, and the debtor has defaulted and failed to remedy the default within the prescribed periods, the court will grant an order for vacant possession to facilitate enforcement by sale, particularly where absence of such order may cause breach of peace. The mortgagee's power of sale under the Mortgage Act is statutory and does not require court order where proper procedure is followed, but court intervention is appropriate to grant vacant possession where necessary.
Outcome
Application granted; Applicant authorized to take vacant possession of mortgaged property and charged assets to facilitate enforcement by sale
Facts
The Applicant bank advanced a loan facility of UGX 5 billion to the Respondent, secured by mortgage over land comprised in LRV 4474 Folio 8 at Lungala in Mpigi District (executed 11 June 2019) and by debenture over machinery and movable property (executed 13 June 2019). The mortgage was registered as an encumbrance on 9 January 2020 and the debenture registered with the Registrar of Companies on 30 January 2020. The Respondent defaulted on loan repayment, with an outstanding balance of UGX 1,336,318,319 continuing to accrue interest at 19% per annum. The Applicant issued a notice of default on 25 November 2022 requiring payment within 45 days, followed by a demand notice on 6 February 2023 requiring payment within 7 days. The Applicant subsequently issued a notice of sale and advertised the mortgaged property in the Daily Monitor on 14 March 2023. On 20 March 2023, the Applicant requested vacant possession from the Respondent. The Respondent did not respond to any notices and did not appear at the hearing despite being served.
Issues
- Whether an order to take over vacant possession of mortgaged land and charged movable property should be granted to the Applicant secured creditor.
Orders
- Order of vacant possession granted in favor of the Applicant concerning land and developments comprised in LRV 4474, Folio 8 at Lungala Mpigi District.
- Costs of this Application to be borne by the Respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (16)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 52 rules 1 & 3
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.20(d)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.24(1)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.24(2)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.44(1)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.44(2)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.44(3)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.44(4)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.44(5)
- Security Interest in Movable Property Act s.47
- Judicature Act s.33
- Mortgage Act s.19(1)
- Mortgage Act s.19(2)
- Mortgage Act s.20(d)
- Mortgage Act s.20(e)
- Mortgage Act s.26
Cases citing this judgment (1)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.