Home › Case law › Centre for Public Interest Law v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 40 of 2015)
Centre for Public Interest Law v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 40 of 2015)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held the sub judice rule is a justifiable limitation on expression, but Rule 73 of Parliament's Rules is unconstitutional in barring debate on sub judice matters.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Centre for Public Interest Law applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.