Stanbic Bank (U) Ltd & 3 Ors v Attorney General (HCT-00-CC-MA 645 of 2011)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that Items 25 and 28 of the Trade (Licensing) (Amendment of Schedule) Instrument SI No. 2 of 2011 contravene Section 8(2)(f) of the Trade (Licensing) Act and are ultra vires. Financial institutions licensed under the Financial Institutions Act No. 2 of 2004 are exempted from obtaining trading licences because they hold separate licences required under written law. The Minister exceeded his statutory powers in amending the Schedule to require banks to pay trade licence fees for branches and ATMs. Orders of certiorari and prohibition granted.
Outcome
Application for judicial review granted. Statutory instrument items quashed and respondent prohibited from implementing them against financial institutions.
Facts
The applicants are four banks licensed by the Central Bank of Uganda under the Financial Institutions Act No. 2 of 2004. On 29 December 2010, the Minister for Tourism, Trade and Industry issued the Trade (Licensing) (Amendment of Schedule) Instrument SI No. 2 of 2011, which amended Part A of the Schedule to the Trade (Licensing) Act by adding Items 25 and 28. These new items required banks to pay trade licence fees for each branch and each Automatic Teller Machine (ATM). The applicants contended that banking business is exempted from trade licensing requirements under Section 8(2)(f) of the Trade (Licensing) Act because banks are separately licensed under the Financial Institutions Act. The Attorney General opposed the application, arguing that the licences under the Financial Institutions Act are regulatory in nature and fundamentally different from trading licences, and that the purpose of the amendment was to allow local governments to collect revenue and control trade and business.
Issues
- Whether Items 25 and 28 of the Trade (Licensing) (Amendment of Schedule) Instrument SI No. 2 of 2011, which require banks to pay trade licence fees for each branch and ATM, contravene Section 8(2)(f) of the Trade (Licensing) Act.
- Whether the Minister acted ultra vires in amending the Schedule to include financial institutions.
- Whether financial institutions fall within the exemption provided by Section 8(2)(f) of the Trade (Licensing) Act as businesses for which a separate licence is required under another written law.
- Whether the licences issued under the Financial Institutions Act are the type of separate licences contemplated by Section 8(2)(f) of the Trade (Licensing) Act.
Orders
- Items 25 and 28 of the Trade (Licensing) (Amendment of Schedule) Instrument SI No. 2 of 2011 are hereby quashed.
- The respondent, his agents, servants, or any other person are prohibited from implementing Items 25 and 28 of the Trade (Licensing) (Amendment of Schedule) Instrument of 2011 against the applicants and other banks.
- Costs of this application to be borne by the respondent.
- Certificate for two counsel granted to the applicants.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (39)
- Judicature (Judicial Review) Rules SI 11 of 2009 r.3(1)(a)
- Judicature (Judicial Review) Rules SI 11 of 2009 r.6(1)
- Judicature (Judicial Review) Rules SI 11 of 2009 r.6(2)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Judicature Act s.33
- Trade (Licensing) Act Cap. 101 s.8(2)(f)
- Trade (Licensing) Act s.8
- Trade (Licensing) Act s.11
- Trade (Licensing) Act s.26
- Trade (Licensing) Act s.27
- Trade (Licensing) Act s.29(b)
- Trade (Licensing) Act s.30(3)
- Trade (Licensing) Act s.31
- Trade (Licensing) Act s.33
- Trade (Licensing) (Amendment of Schedule) Instrument SI No. 2 of 2011 Items 25 and 28
- Financial Institutions Act No. 2 of 2004 s.3
- Financial Institutions Act s.4
- Financial Institutions Act s.10
- Financial Institutions Act s.11
- Financial Institutions Act s.12
- Financial Institutions Act s.13
- Financial Institutions Act s.14(2)
- Financial Institutions Act s.15
- Financial Institutions Act s.17
- Financial Institutions Act s.46
- Financial Institutions Act s.79(1)
- Local Governments Act (1997) s.31(1)
- Local Governments Act s.80(1)
- Local Governments Act Second Schedule Part 1 Item 4
- Local Governments Act Second Schedule Part 2 Item 5(n)
- Local Governments Act Second Schedule Part 2 Item 6
- Local Governments Act Second Schedule Part 3 Item 3(e)
- Local Governments Act Second Schedule Part 3 Item 26
- Local Governments Revenue Regulations Fifth Schedule Reg. 13
- Petroleum Supply Act No. 13 of 2003
- Markets Act
- Liquor Act
- Kampala Capital City Authority Act
- Trading Act Cap. 100 (repealed)
Cases cited (10)
- John Jet Tumwebaze v Makerere University Council (Civil Application No. 353 of 2005)
- Proline Soccer Academy Limited v Lawrence Mulindwa & Others (HCMA No. 459 of 2009)
- Uganda Lottery Ltd v Attorney General (HCT-00-CC-MC-627 of 2008)
- R v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, Ex parte National Federation of Self Employed and Small Businesses Ltd. [1962] AC 617
- The King v. Electricity Commissioners, Ex parte London Electricity Joint Committee [1924] I KB 171
- In Re An Application by Bukoba Gymkhana Club [1963] E.A. 473
- Sussex Peerage Case (1844) 8 ER 1034
- R v. Edmundson (1859) 28 LJMC 213
- Shah Vershi Devshi & Co. v. The Transport Licensing Board [1971] EA 289
- Dupont Steels Ltd. v. Sirs [1980] 1 WLR 142
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.