Skip to content
Wakilii

Constitution (Sentencing Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions

Legal Notice 8 of 2013 Current version · as at 24 May 2013
Enacted2013
Commenced26 April 2013
Last amended
Point-in-time consolidation · as at 24 May 2013. This page may not reflect amendments made after that date. Confirm the current position against the latest Uganda Gazette before relying on it.

About this Act

A full descriptive summary for this Act has not been recorded yet.

Jurisdiction
Uganda
Type
Principal Legislation
Status
In force
Language
English

Full text of the Act

36 parts · 134 sections · 4 Schedules

Enhanced Annotated View adds approved, source-linked propositions, operative requirements, judicial passages, related provisions, amendment notes and authority status. Choose Original PDF to inspect the source consolidation.

Uganda

Constitution (Sentencing Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions

Commenced on 26 April 2013

[This is the version of this document at 24 May 2013.]

Part i

6. General sentencing principles

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “General sentencing principles”.

“General sentencing principles”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “General sentencing principles”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
7. Sentencing of co-accused persons or multiple offenders

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Sentencing of co-accused persons or multiple offenders”.

“Sentencing of co-accused persons or multiple offenders”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Sentencing of co-accused persons or multiple offenders”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
8. Calculating the totality of a sentence

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Calculating the totality of a sentence”.

“Calculating the totality of a sentence”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Calculating the totality of a sentence”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
9. Custodial sentences

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Custodial sentences”.

“Custodial sentences”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Custodial sentences”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part IV

10. Sentencing options

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Sentencing options”.

“Sentencing options”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Sentencing options”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
11. Sentencing Orders

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Sentencing Orders”.

“Sentencing Orders”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Sentencing Orders”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part VIII

26. Sentencing options for manslaughter , robbery or defilement

Manslaughter

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Sentencing options for manslaughter , robbery or defilement”.

“Manslaughter”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Sentencing options for manslaughter , robbery or defilement”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
27. Sentencing range for manslaughter

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Sentencing range for manslaughter”.

“Sentencing range for manslaughter”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Sentencing range for manslaughter”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
28. Factors aggravating a sentence for manslaughter

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Factors aggravating a sentence for manslaughter”.

“Factors aggravating a sentence for manslaughter”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Factors aggravating a sentence for manslaughter”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
29. Factors mitigating a sentence for manslaughter

Robbery

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Factors mitigating a sentence for manslaughter”.

“Robbery”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Factors mitigating a sentence for manslaughter”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
30. Sentencing range for robbery

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Sentencing range for robbery”.

“Sentencing range for robbery”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Sentencing range for robbery”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
31. Factors aggravating a sentence for robbery

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Factors aggravating a sentence for robbery”.

“Factors aggravating a sentence for robbery”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Factors aggravating a sentence for robbery”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
32. Factors mitigating a sentence for robbery

Defilement

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Factors mitigating a sentence for robbery”.

“Defilement”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Factors mitigating a sentence for robbery”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
33. Sentencing range for defilement

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Sentencing range for defilement”.

“Sentencing range for defilement”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Sentencing range for defilement”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
34. Considerations in determining a sentence for defilement

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Considerations in determining a sentence for defilement”.

“Considerations in determining a sentence for defilement”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Considerations in determining a sentence for defilement”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
35. Factors aggravating a sentence for defilement

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Factors aggravating a sentence for defilement”.

“Factors aggravating a sentence for defilement”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Factors aggravating a sentence for defilement”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
36. Factors mitigating a sentence for defilement

Paragraph Criminal trespass

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Factors mitigating a sentence for defilement”.

“Paragraph Criminal trespass”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Factors mitigating a sentence for defilement”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
37. Sentencing range for criminal trespass

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Sentencing range for criminal trespass”.

“Sentencing range for criminal trespass”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Sentencing range for criminal trespass”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
38. Considerations in determining a sentence for

criminal trespass

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Considerations in determining a sentence for”.

“criminal trespass”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Considerations in determining a sentence for”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
39. Factors aggravating a sentence for criminal trespass

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Factors aggravating a sentence for criminal trespass”.

“Factors aggravating a sentence for criminal trespass”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Factors aggravating a sentence for criminal trespass”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
40. Factors mitigating a sentence for criminal trespass

Corruption and related offences

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Factors mitigating a sentence for criminal trespass”.

“Corruption and related offences”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Factors mitigating a sentence for criminal trespass”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
41. Sentencing range for corruption and corruption

related offences

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Sentencing range for corruption and corruption”.

“related offences”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Sentencing range for corruption and corruption”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
42. Considerations in determining a sentence for

corruption and related offences.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Considerations in determining a sentence for”.

“corruption and related offences.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Considerations in determining a sentence for”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
43. Factors aggravating a sentence for corruption

or a corruption related offence.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Factors aggravating a sentence for corruption”.

“or a corruption related offence.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
44. Factors mitigating a sentence for corruption

or a related offence Theft and theft related offences

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Factors mitigating a sentence for corruption”.

“or a related offence Theft and theft related offences”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
45. Sentencing range for theft and theft related offences

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Sentencing range for theft and theft related offences”.

“Sentencing range for theft and theft related offences”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Sentencing range for theft and theft related offences”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
46. Considerations in determining a sentence for

theft and theft related offences.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Considerations in determining a sentence for”.

“theft and theft related offences.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Considerations in determining a sentence for”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
47. Factors aggravating a sentence for theft

or a theft related offence

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Factors aggravating a sentence for theft”.

“or a theft related offence”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
48. Factors mitigating a sentence for theft

or a theft related offence

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Factors mitigating a sentence for theft”.

“or a theft related offence”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part XII

55. Duty of the prosecution

Specific duties for the prosecution

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Duty of the prosecution”.

“Specific duties for the prosecution”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Duty of the prosecution”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
56. Indication of sentence

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Indication of sentence”.

“Indication of sentence”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Indication of sentence”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
57. Amicable settlements and restorative justice

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Amicable settlements and restorative justice”.

“Amicable settlements and restorative justice”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Amicable settlements and restorative justice”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
58. Ancillary, compensatory and related orders

Duty of the defence

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Ancillary, compensatory and related orders”.

“Duty of the defence”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Ancillary, compensatory and related orders”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
60. Duty of the defence

SCHEDULES

FIRST SCHEDULE: FORM A - Victim impact statement FORM B - Community impact statement

SECOND SCHEDULE Factors to take into consideration when sentencing.

THIRD SCHEDULE Sentencing ranges

FOURTH SCHEDULE Scale for determination of fines.

The Constitution (Sentencing Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions, 2013 (Under article 133(l)(b) of the Constitution)

In exercise of the powers conferred upon the Chief Justice by article 133 (1) (b) of the Constitution, these Practice Directions are issued this 26th day of April, 2013.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Duty of the defence”.

“SCHEDULES”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Duty of the defence”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part I

1. Title

These Practice Directions may be cited as The Constitution (Sentencing Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions, 2013.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Title”.

“These Practice Directions may be cited as The Constitution (Sentencing Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions, 2013.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. These Practice Directions may be cited as The Constitution (Sentencing Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions, 2013.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
2. Application

These Practice Directions shall apply to all courts of judicature.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Scope rule

This section defines when and how “Application” applies.

“These Practice Directions shall apply to all courts of judicature.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Confirm that the matter and forum fall within this section before applying the Act's remaining provisions.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. These Practice Directions shall apply to all courts of judicature.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
3. Objectives of these Practice Directions

The objectives of these Practice Directions are-

(a)

to set out the purpose for which offenders may be sentenced or dealt with;

(b)

to provide principles and guidelines to be applied by courts in sentencing;

(c)

to provide sentence ranges and other means of dealing with offenders;

(d)

to provide a mechanism for considering the interests of victims of crime and the community when sentencing; and

(e)

to provide a mechanism that will promote uniformity, consistency and transparency in sentencing.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Definition

This section supplies the definitions or statutory meaning governing “Objectives of these Practice Directions”.

“The objectives of these Practice Directions are-”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this definition when interpreting other provisions that employ the language addressed by “Objectives of these Practice Directions”.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

5
  1. (a) to set out the purpose for which offenders may be sentenced or dealt with;
  2. (b) to provide principles and guidelines to be applied by courts in sentencing;
  3. (c) to provide sentence ranges and other means of dealing with offenders;
  4. (d) to provide a mechanism for considering the interests of victims of crime and the community when sentencing; and
  5. (e) to provide a mechanism that will promote uniformity, consistency and transparency in sentencing.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
4. Interpretation

In these Practice Directions, unless the context otherwise requires-

"advanced age" means 75 years and above; "child offender" means an offender below the age of eighteen years; "community" means the residents of the locality where the victim or the offender lived at the time the offence was committed or where the offence was committed; "community impact statement" means a written or oral account of the general harm suffered by members of a community as a result of the offence; "community service order" means a sentence imposed under the Community Service Act;

"currency point" has been defined in the fourth schedule;

. "custodial sentence" means longterm, midterm or shortterm imprisonment; "court" means a court of judicature established by or under the authority of the Constitution; "imprisonment for life" means imprisonment for the natural life of an offender; "long term imprisonment" means a custodial sentence ranging from 30 to 45 years;

"mid-term imprisonment" means a custodial sentence ranging from 15 to 29 years; "minor offence" means an offence for which a court may pass a sentence not exceeding two years imprisonment; "pre-sentence report" means information on the social background of the offender intended to assist the court in arriving at an appropriate sentence; "primary care-giver" means a person who takes primary responsibility of a child below 4 years;

"responsible officer" means probation and social welfare officer, community development officer or any other person designated by the court;

"restorative justice" means repairing the harm caused to the victim by the commission of the offence to the victim, transforming the offender, reconciling the offender with the victim and the community;

"sentencing range" means the bracket within which a sentence is given by the court;

"short term imprisonment" means a custodial sentence ranging from 15 years and below;

"victim" means a person directly or indirectly affected by the commission of the offence or omission of a lawful duty;

"victim impact statement" means a written or oral account of the personal harm suffered by a victim of crime;

"youthful age" means the age between 18 to 35 years.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Definition

This section supplies the definitions or statutory meaning governing “Interpretation”.

“In these Practice Directions, unless the context otherwise requires-”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this definition when interpreting other provisions that employ the language addressed by “Interpretation”.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

10
  1. "advanced age" means 75 years and above; "child offender" means an offender below the age of eighteen years; "community" means the residents of the locality where the victim or the offender lived at the time the offence was committed or where the offence was committed; "community impact statement" means a written or oral account of the general harm suffered by members of a community as a result of the offence; "community service order" means a sentence imposed under the Community Service Act;
  2. "currency point" has been defined in the fourth schedule;
  3. "mid-term imprisonment" means a custodial sentence ranging from 15 to 29 years; "minor offence" means an offence for which a court may pass a sentence not exceeding two years imprisonment; "pre-sentence report" means information on the social background of the offender intended to assist the court in arriving at an appropriate sentence; "primary care-giver" means a person who takes primary responsibility of a child below 4 years;
  4. "responsible officer" means probation and social welfare officer, community development officer or any other person designated by the court;
  5. "restorative justice" means repairing the harm caused to the victim by the commission of the offence to the victim, transforming the offender, reconciling the offender with the victim and the community;
  6. "sentencing range" means the bracket within which a sentence is given by the court;
  7. "short term imprisonment" means a custodial sentence ranging from 15 years and below;
  8. "victim" means a person directly or indirectly affected by the commission of the offence or omission of a lawful duty;

2 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions
Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part II

5. Purpose of sentencing
(1)

The purpose of sentencing is to promote respect for the law in order to maintain a just, peaceful and safe society and to promote initiatives to prevent crime.

(2)

For the purposes of subparagraph (1), the court shall in accordance with the sentencing principles pass a sentence aimed at- (a) denouncing unlawful conduct;

(b)

deterring a person from committing an offence; (c) separating an offender from society where necessary; (d) assisting in rehabilitating and re-integrating an offender into society;

(e)

providing reparation for harm done to a victim or to the community; or

(f)

promoting a sense of responsibility by the offender, acknowledging the harm done to the victim and the community.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Purpose of sentencing”.

“(1) The purpose of sentencing is to promote respect for the law in order to maintain a just, peaceful and safe society and to promote initiatives to prevent crime.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

5
  1. (1) The purpose of sentencing is to promote respect for the law in order to maintain a just, peaceful and safe society and to promote initiatives to prevent crime.
  2. (2) For the purposes of subparagraph (1), the court shall in accordance with the sentencing principles pass a sentence aimed at- (a) denouncing unlawful conduct;
  3. (b) deterring a person from committing an offence; (c) separating an offender from society where necessary; (d) assisting in rehabilitating and re-integrating an offender into society;
  4. (e) providing reparation for harm done to a victim or to the community; or
  5. (f) promoting a sense of responsibility by the offender, acknowledging the harm done to the victim and the community.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part III

6. General sentencing principles

Every court shall when sentencing an offender take into account-

(a)

the gravity of the offence, including the degree of culpability of the offender;

(b)

the nature of the offence;

(c)

the need for consistency with appropriate sentencing levels and other means of dealing with offenders in respect of similar offences committed in similar circumstances; (d) any information provided to the court concerning the effect of the offence on the victim or the community, including victim impact statement or community impact statement;

(e)

the offender's personal, family, community, or cultural background;

(0 any outcomes of restorative justice processes that have occurred, or are likely to occur, in relation to the particular case;

(g)

the circumstances prevailing at the time the offence was committed up to the time of sentencing;

(h)

any previous convictions of the offender; or

(i)

any other circumstances court considers relevant.

7. Sentencing of co-accused persons or multiple offenders

The court shall consider the specific circumstances of each offender before sentencing co-accused persons or multiple offenders.

8. Calculating the totality of a sentence
(1)

Where the court imposes consecutive sentences, the court shall first identify the material part of the conduct giving rise to the commission of the offence and determine the total sentence to . be imposed.

(2)

The total sum of the cumulative sentence shall be proportionate to the culpability of the offender.

9. Custodial sentences
(1)

A custodial sentences, may be imposed where the circumstances do not meet the considerations for a sentence of imprisonment for life.

(2)

A custodial sentence may be-

(a)

long-term imprisonment;

(b)

mid-term imprisonment; or

(c)

short-term imprisonment.

(3)

The court shall before imposing a custodial sentence consider-

(a)

whether the purpose of sentencing cannot be achieved by a sentence other than imprisonment;

(b)

the values, norms and aspirations of the people within the community;

(c)

the character and antecedents of the offender;

(d)

the circumstances and nature of the crime committed;

(e)

the ruthlessness with which the offender committed the offence;

(f)

the health and mental state of the offender;

(g)

previous conviction record;

(h)

the age of the offender;

(i)

remorsefulness or conduct of the offender;

(j)

whether the offender may be a danger to the community;

(k)

views of the victim's family or community; or

(I)

any other matter that court considers relevant.

(4)

The court may not sentence an offender to a custodial sentence where the offender-

(a)

is of advanced age;

(b)

has a grave terminal illness certified by a medical practitioner;

(c)

was below 18 years at the time of the commission of the offence; or

(d)

is an expectant woman.

(5)

The court shall when sentencing a first time offender consider that imprisonment is not a desirable sentence for a minor offence.

Part IV

10. Sentencing options

The court may impose any of the following sentencing options-

(a)

death penalty;

(b)

imprisonment for life; (c) imprisonment for a specified period of time; (d) a fine; (e) community service; (f) probation; (g) a caution and discharge without punishment; and (h) any other lawful sentence option.

11. Sentencing Orders

The court may make any of the following orders when sentencing an offender-

(a)

conditional discharge;

(b)

costs;

(c)

compensation;

(d)

restitution;

(e)

forfeiture; or

(f)

any other lawful sentencing order.

Part V

12. Time to consider sentence

The court shall upon conviction, allow a reasonable period not exceeding seven days to determine the appropriate sentence for the offender.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Mandatory duty

This section imposes mandatory requirements concerning “Time to consider sentence”.

“The court shall upon conviction, allow a reasonable period not exceeding seven days to determine the appropriate sentence for the offender.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The provision uses mandatory language; the responsible person or institution should be able to demonstrate compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. The court shall upon conviction, allow a reasonable period not exceeding seven days to determine the appropriate sentence for the offender.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
13. Indication of sentence

The court may, before imposing a sentence or during the sentencing hearing, ask the offender and the prosecution to indicate to the court an appropriate sentence in respect of the offence.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Indication of sentence”.

“The court may, before imposing a sentence or during the sentencing hearing, ask the offender and the prosecution to indicate to the court an appropriate sentence in respect of the offence.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. The court may, before imposing a sentence or during the sentencing hearing, ask the offender and the prosecution to indicate to the court an appropriate sentence in respect of the offence.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
14. General factors to consider at sentencing
(1)

In order to determine the appropriate sentence, the court shall take into account matters required to be taken into account by any law, and shall make the inquiry, in the case of- (a) the High Court, under section 98 of the Trial on Indictments Act; or (b) a Magistrate's court, under sections 133, 164 or 165 of the Magistrates Courts Act.

(2)

For the purposes of paragraph (1), the court may require the prosecution to produce to the court- (a) a victim impact statement specified in Form A of the First Schedule; and

(b)

a community impact statement specified in Form B of the First Schedule.

(3)

The court may summon and examine any person to give evidence regarding-

(a)

any custom prevalent in any area; (b) the way of living of any community; or (c) the background against which the alleged offence was committed.

(4)

The inquiry under sub paragraph (1) may include-

(a)

consideration of the employment, earning ability, financial resources and assets of the offender at present or in the future, including any circumstance that may affect the ability to make reparation, pay compensation or a fine; or <b) information relating to any benefit, financial or otherwise, ^r,v^ directly or indirectly, as a result of the commission of the offence.

(5)

The court shall take into account the matters specified in the Second Schedule and the considerations specified in respect of each offence.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “General factors to consider at sentencing”.

“(1) In order to determine the appropriate sentence, the court shall take into account matters required to be taken into account by any law, and shall make the inquiry, in the case of- (a) the High Court, under section 98 of the Trial on Indictments Act; or (b) a Magistrate's court, under sections 133, 164 or 165 of the Magistrates Courts Act.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

8
  1. (1) In order to determine the appropriate sentence, the court shall take into account matters required to be taken into account by any law, and shall make the inquiry, in the case of- (a) the High Court, under section 98 of the Trial on Indictments Act; or (b) a Magistrate's court, under sections 133, 164 or 165 of the Magistrates Courts Act.
  2. (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1), the court may require the prosecution to produce to the court- (a) a victim impact statement specified in Form A of the First Schedule; and
  3. (b) a community impact statement specified in Form B of the First Schedule.
  4. (3) The court may summon and examine any person to give evidence regarding-
  5. (a) any custom prevalent in any area; (b) the way of living of any community; or (c) the background against which the alleged offence was committed.
  6. (4) The inquiry under sub paragraph (1) may include-
  7. (a) consideration of the employment, earning ability, financial resources and assets of the offender at present or in the future, including any circumstance that may affect the ability to make reparation, pay compensation or a fine; or <b) information relating to any benefit, financial or otherwise, ^r,v^ directly or indirectly, as a result of the commission of the offence.
  8. (5) The court shall take into account the matters specified in the Second Schedule and the considerations specified in respect of each offence.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions
Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
15. Remand period to be taken into account
(i)

The court shall take into account any period spent on remand in determining an appropriate sentence.

(2)

The court shall deduct the period spent on remand from the sentence considered appropriate after all factors have been taken into account.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Mandatory duty

This section imposes mandatory requirements concerning “Remand period to be taken into account”.

“(i) The court shall take into account any period spent on remand in determining an appropriate sentence.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The provision uses mandatory language; the responsible person or institution should be able to demonstrate compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

2
  1. (i) The court shall take into account any period spent on remand in determining an appropriate sentence.
  2. (2) The court shall deduct the period spent on remand from the sentence considered appropriate after all factors have been taken into account.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
16. Commencement of custodial sentence

Except where a custodial sentence is in default of payment of a fine, every custodial sentence shall be effective from the date of conviction.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Mandatory duty

This section imposes mandatory requirements concerning “Commencement of custodial sentence”.

“Except where a custodial sentence is in default of payment of a fine, every custodial sentence shall be effective from the date of conviction.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The provision uses mandatory language; the responsible person or institution should be able to demonstrate compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. Except where a custodial sentence is in default of payment of a fine, every custodial sentence shall be effective from the date of conviction.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part VI

17. Imposing a sentence of death

The court may only pass a sentence of death in exceptional circumstances in the "rarest of the rare" cases where the alternative of imprisonment for life or other custodial sentence is demonstrably inadequate.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Imposing a sentence of death”.

“The court may only pass a sentence of death in exceptional circumstances in the "rarest of the rare" cases where the alternative of imprisonment for life or other custodial sentence is demonstrably inadequate.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. The court may only pass a sentence of death in exceptional circumstances in the "rarest of the rare" cases where the alternative of imprisonment for life or other custodial sentence is demonstrably inadequate.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
18. The "rarest of the rare" cases

The "rarest of the rare" cases include cases where-

(a)

the court is satisfied that the commission of the offence was planned or meticulously premeditated and executed;

(b)

the victim was-

(i)

a law enforcement officer or a public officer killed during the performance of his or her functions; or

(ii)

a person who has given or was likely to give material evidence in court proceedings;

(c)

the death of the victimi was caused by the offender while committing or attempting to commit-

(i)

murder;

(ii)

rape;

(iii)

defilement;

(iv)

robbery;

(v)

kidnapping with intent to murder;

(vi)

terrorism; or

(vii)

treason;

(d)

the commission of the offence was caused by a person or group of persons acting in the execution or furtherance of a common purpose or conspiracy;

(e)

the victim was killed in order to unlawfully remove any body part of the victim or as a result of the unlawful removal of a body part of the victim; or

(f)

the victim was killed in the act of human sacrifice.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “The "rarest of the rare" cases”.

“The "rarest of the rare" cases include cases where-”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

15
  1. (a) the court is satisfied that the commission of the offence was planned or meticulously premeditated and executed;
  2. (b) the victim was-
  3. (i) a law enforcement officer or a public officer killed during the performance of his or her functions; or
  4. (ii) a person who has given or was likely to give material evidence in court proceedings;
  5. (c) the death of the victimi was caused by the offender while committing or attempting to commit-
  6. (i) murder;
  7. (ii) rape;
  8. (iii) defilement;

7 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
19. Sentencing ranges in capital offences
(1)

The court shall be guided by the sentencing range specified in

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Mandatory duty

This section imposes mandatory requirements concerning “Sentencing ranges in capital offences”.

“(1) The court shall be guided by the sentencing range specified in”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The provision uses mandatory language; the responsible person or institution should be able to demonstrate compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. (1) The court shall be guided by the sentencing range specified in
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part I

20. Factors aggravating a death sentence

In considering imposing a sentence of death, the court shall take into account-

(a)

the degree of injury or harm; (b) the part of the victim's body where harm or injury was occasioned;

(c)

sustained or repeated injury or harm to the victim; (d) the degree of meticulous pre-meditation or planning; (e) use and nature of the weapon;

(f)

whether the offender deliberately caused loss of life in the course of the commission of another grave offence;

(g)

whether the offender deliberately targeted and caused death of a vulnerable victim;

(h)

whether the offender was part of a group or gang and the role of the offender in the group, gang or commission of the crime;

(i)

whether the offence was motivated by, or demonstrated hostility based on the victim's age, gender, disability or other discriminating characteristic;

G) whether the offence was committed against a vulnerable person or member of a community like a pregnant woman, child or person of advanced age;

(k)

whether the offence was committed in the presence of another person like a child or spouse of the victim;

(I)

whether there was gratuitous degradation of the victim like multiple incidents of harm or injury or sexual abuse;

(m)

whether there was any attempt to conceal or dispose of evidence;

(n)

whether there was an abuse of power or a position of trust;

(o)

whether there were previous incidents of violence or threats to the victim;

(p)

the impact of the crime on the victim's family, relatives or the community; or

(q)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Factors aggravating a death sentence”.

“In considering imposing a sentence of death, the court shall take into account-”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

13
  1. (a) the degree of injury or harm; (b) the part of the victim's body where harm or injury was occasioned;
  2. (c) sustained or repeated injury or harm to the victim; (d) the degree of meticulous pre-meditation or planning; (e) use and nature of the weapon;
  3. (f) whether the offender deliberately caused loss of life in the course of the commission of another grave offence;
  4. (g) whether the offender deliberately targeted and caused death of a vulnerable victim;
  5. (h) whether the offender was part of a group or gang and the role of the offender in the group, gang or commission of the crime;
  6. (i) whether the offence was motivated by, or demonstrated hostility based on the victim's age, gender, disability or other discriminating characteristic;
  7. (k) whether the offence was committed in the presence of another person like a child or spouse of the victim;
  8. (I) whether there was gratuitous degradation of the victim like multiple incidents of harm or injury or sexual abuse;

5 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
21. Factors mitigating a sentence of death

In considering imposing a sentence of death, the court shall take into account the following mitigating factors-

(a)

lack of premeditation;

(b)

a subordinate or lesser role in a group or gang involved in the commission of the offence;

(c)

mental disorder or disability linked to the commission of the offence;

(d)

some element of self-defense;

(e)

plea of guilt;

(0 the fact that the offender is a first offender with no previous conviction or no relevant or recent conviction;

(g)

the fact that there was a single or isolated act or omission occasioning fatal injury;

(h)

injury less serious in the context of the offence;

(i)

remorsefulness of the offender;

Ci) some element of provocation;

(k)

whether the offender pleaded guilty;

(l)

advanced or youthful age of the offender; (m) family responsibilities; (n) some element of intoxication; or (o) any other factor the court considers relevant.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Factors mitigating a sentence of death”.

“In considering imposing a sentence of death, the court shall take into account the following mitigating factors-”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

10
  1. (a) lack of premeditation;
  2. (b) a subordinate or lesser role in a group or gang involved in the commission of the offence;
  3. (c) mental disorder or disability linked to the commission of the offence;
  4. (d) some element of self-defense;
  5. (e) plea of guilt;
  6. (g) the fact that there was a single or isolated act or omission occasioning fatal injury;
  7. (h) injury less serious in the context of the offence;
  8. (i) remorsefulness of the offender;

2 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
22. Sentence of death in rape or defilement cases

In rape or defilement cases, the court shall consider imposing a sentence of death where the offence was committed under any of the following circumstances-

(a)

where the victim was raped or defiled repeatedly whether by the offender or by a co-accused, co-perpetrator or an accomplice;

(b)

by more than one offender, where such persons acted in the execution or furtherance of a common purpose or conspiracy;

(c)

by an offender who has been convicted of an earlier offence of rape or defilement;

(d)

by an offender knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that he or she has acquired HIV/AIDS;

(e)

repeatedly by an offender who is supposed to take primary responsibility of the child victim;

(f)

where the victim was gang raped or gang defiled; or

(g)

where the victim-

(i)

is physically disabled and due to her physical disability, is rendered vulnerable;

(ii)

is mentally challenged;

(iii)

has sustained serious injuries arising from the infliction of grievous bodily harm; or

(iv)

any other extremely grave circumstances.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Sentence of death in rape or defilement cases”.

“In rape or defilement cases, the court shall consider imposing a sentence of death where the offence was committed under any of the following circumstances-”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

11
  1. (a) where the victim was raped or defiled repeatedly whether by the offender or by a co-accused, co-perpetrator or an accomplice;
  2. (b) by more than one offender, where such persons acted in the execution or furtherance of a common purpose or conspiracy;
  3. (c) by an offender who has been convicted of an earlier offence of rape or defilement;
  4. (d) by an offender knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that he or she has acquired HIV/AIDS;
  5. (e) repeatedly by an offender who is supposed to take primary responsibility of the child victim;
  6. (f) where the victim was gang raped or gang defiled; or
  7. (g) where the victim-
  8. (i) is physically disabled and due to her physical disability, is rendered vulnerable;

3 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part VII

23. Imprisonment for life

Imprisonment for life is the second gravest punishment next to the sentence of death.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Governing rule

This section states the governing statutory rule for “Imprisonment for life”.

“Imprisonment for life is the second gravest punishment next to the sentence of death.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this section as the starting statutory rule for “Imprisonment for life”, together with the linked provisions and current consolidation.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
24. Imprisonment for life in capital offences
(1)

In capital offences, the court shall consider imposing a sentence of imprisonment for life where the circumstances of the offence do not justify a sentence of death.

(2)

In determining whether the circumstances of an offence or offender justify imposing a death sentence or imprisonment for life, court shall consider the factors aggravating or mitigating a death sentence.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Imprisonment for life in capital offences”.

“(1) In capital offences, the court shall consider imposing a sentence of imprisonment for life where the circumstances of the offence do not justify a sentence of death.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

2
  1. (1) In capital offences, the court shall consider imposing a sentence of imprisonment for life where the circumstances of the offence do not justify a sentence of death.
  2. (2) In determining whether the circumstances of an offence or offender justify imposing a death sentence or imprisonment for life, court shall consider the factors aggravating or mitigating a death sentence.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
25. Imprisonment for life in non-capital offences

In non-capital offences, the court shall consider imposing a sentence of imprisonment for life where any other custodial forms of punishment is inadequate.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Mandatory duty

This section imposes mandatory requirements concerning “Imprisonment for life in non-capital offences”.

“In non-capital offences, the court shall consider imposing a sentence of imprisonment for life where any other custodial forms of punishment is inadequate.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The provision uses mandatory language; the responsible person or institution should be able to demonstrate compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. In non-capital offences, the court shall consider imposing a sentence of imprisonment for life where any other custodial forms of punishment is inadequate.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part VIII

26. Sentencing options for manslaughter , robbery or defilement

The court may sentence an offender convicted of manslaughter, robbery or defilement to-

(a)

imprisonment for life;

(b)

a custodial sentence other than imprisonment for life; or

(c)

any other sentence authorised by law.

Manslaughter

27. Sentencing range for manslaughter
(1)

The court shall be guided by the sentencing range specified in

Part II

28. Factors aggravating a sentence for manslaughter

In considering imposing a sentence for manslaughter the court shall be guided by the following aggravating factors-

(a)

degree of injury or harm;

(b)

the part of the victim's body where harm or injury was occasioned;

(c)

repeated injury or harm to the victim;

(d)

degree of intention to cause death or culpable negligence;

(e)

use and nature of the weapon;

(f)

the role of the offender in a group or gang or mob involved in the commission of the offence;

(g)

whether the offence was motivated by an intention to cause bodily harm;

(h)

whether the offence is a result of culpable negligence to discharge a duty tending to the preservation of life; or

(i)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

29. Factors mitigating a sentence for manslaughter

In considering imposing a sentence for manslaughter, the court shall take into account the following mitigating factors-

(a)

lack of intention to cause death or culpable negligence;

(b)

whether the offender had a subordinate or lesser role in a group or gang involved in the commission of the offence;

(c)

the mental disorder or disability where linked to the commission of an offence;

(d)

some element of self-defence; or

(e)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

Robbery

30. Sentencing range for robbery
(1)

The court shall be guided by the sentencing range specified in

Part III

31. Factors aggravating a sentence for robbery

In considering imposing a sentence for robbery, the court shall be guided by the following aggravating factors-

(a)

degree of injury or harm;

(b)

the part of the victim's body where harm or injury was occasioned;

(c)

whether there was repeated injury or harm to the victim;

(d)

use and nature of the weapon;

(e)

whether the offender deliberately caused loss of life in the course of the commission of the robbery;

(0 whether the offender deliberately targeted or caused death of a vulnerable victim;

(g)

whether the offender was part of a group or gang and the role of the offender in the group, gang or commission of the crime;

(h)

whether the offence was motivated by, or demonstrates hostility based on the victim's age, gender, disability or such other discriminating characteristics;

(i)

the nature of the deadly weapon used during the commission of the offence;

0) the gratuitous nature of violence against the victim including multiple incidents of harm or injury;

(k)

the manner in which death occurred during the commission of the offence;

(I)

the value of the property or amount of money taken during the commission of the offence;

(m)

commission of other criminal acts such as rape or assault;

(n)

whether the offence was committed as part of a pre-meditated, planned or concerted act and the degree of pre-meditation;

(o)

the rampant nature of the offence in the area or community;

(P)

whether the offence was committed in the presence of other persons such as children, a spouse of victim or relatives;

(q)

whether the offender is a habitual offender;

(r)

whether the offence was committed while under the influence of alcohol or drugs;

(s)

whether the offender is remorseful;

(t)

previous incidents of violence or threats to the victim by the offender;

(u)

evidence of impact on the victim's family, relatives or the community; or

(v)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

32. Factors mitigating a sentence for robbery

Jn considering a sentence for robbery, the court shall take into account the following mitigating factors-

(a)

1 ack of pre-medi tati on;

(b)

whether the offender had a subordinate or lesser role in a group or gang involved in the commission of the offence;

(c)

mental disorder or disability;

(d)

whether the offender is a first offender with no previous conviction or no relevant or recent conviction;

(e)

whether there was a single or isolated act or omission occasioning fatal injury;

(f)

whether there was no injury or harm occasioned or no threat of death or harm;

(g)

remorsefulness of the offender;

(h)

the value of the property or amount of money taken during the commission of the offence;

(i)

whether property or money was returned or recovered;

Ci) family responsibilities of the offender; or

(k)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

Defilement

33. Sentencing range for defilement
(1)

The court shall be guided by the sentencing range specified in

Part IV

34. Considerations in determining a sentence for defilement

The court shall take into account the following factors in considering a sentence for defilement-

(a)

the age of the victim and the offender;

(b)

the nature of the relationship of the victim and the offender;

(c)

the violence, trauma, brutality and fear instilled upon the victim;

(d)

the remorsefulness of the offender;

(e)

operation of other restorative processes; or (D the HIV/AIDS status of the offender.

35. Factors aggravating a sentence for defilement

In determining a sentence for defilement, the court shall be guided by the following aggravating factors-

(a)

the degree of injury or harm;

(b)

whether there was repeated injury or harm to the victim; (c) whether there was a deliberate intent to infect the victim with HIV/AIDS;

(d)

whether the victim was of tender age; (e) the offender's knowledge of his HIV/AIDS status; (f) knowledge whether the victim is mentally challenged; (g) the degree of pre-meditation; (h) threats or use of force or violence against the victim; (i) knowledge of the tender age of the victim; (j) use or letting of premises for immoral or criminal activities; (k) whether the offence was motivated by, or demonstrating hostility based on the victim's status of being mentally challenged; or

(1)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

36. Factors mitigating a sentence for defilement

In considering a sentence for defilement, the court shall take into account the following mitigating factors-

(a)

lack of pre-meditation; (b) whether the mental disorder or disability of the offender was linked to the commission of the offence;

(c)

remorsefulness of the offender;

(d)

whether the offender is a first offender with no previous conviction or no relevant or recent conviction ;

(e)

the offender's plea of guilty;

(f)

the difference in age of the victim and offender; or

(g)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

Criminal trespass

37. Sentencing range for criminal trespass
(1)

The court shall be guided by the sentencing range specified in

Part V

38. Considerations in determining a sentence for

criminal trespass In considering a sentence for criminal trespass, the court shall take into account the following factors-

(a)

the nature and prevalence of the offence;

(b)

the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence;

(c)

the relationship between the parties and the conduct of the offender; or

(d)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

39. Factors aggravating a sentence for criminal trespass

In considering imposing a sentence for criminal trespass, the court shall be guided by the following aggravating factors-

(a)

the degree of pre-meditation;

(b)

intimidating, insulting or annoying language or behaviour;

(c)

nature and gravity of the offence committed upon entry on property;

(d)

use or threat of use of force or violence while on the property;

(e)

that the offence is motivated by, or demonstrates, hostility based on the victim's age, gender, disability or such other discriminating characteristics; or

(f)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

40. Factors mitigating a sentence for criminal trespass

In considering a sentence for criminal trespass, the court shall take into account the following mitigating factors-

(a)

lack of pre-meditation;

(b)

whether the mental disorder or disability of the offender was linked to the commission of the offence;

(c)

whether the offender is a first offender with no previous conviction or no relevant or recent conviction ;

(d)

remorsefulness of the offender;

(e)

family responsibilities of the offender; or

(f)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

Corruption and related offences

41. Sentencing range for corruption and corruption

related offences (1) The court shall be guided by the sentencing range specified in

42. Considerations in determining a sentence for

corruption and related offences In considering a sentence for corruption or a corruption related offence, the court shall take into account the following factors-

(a)

the method used in the commission of the offence;

(b)

breach of trust and nature of trust or office abused;

(c)

the relationship between the offender and the aggrieved organization;

(d)

the amount of money involved or potential prejudice;

(e)

the status of the individual receiving the monies;

(f)

the degree of sophistication involved in the corrupt act;

(g)

the impact of the corrupt act to the victim organization, the state and society as well as to the administration of justice; or

(h)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

43. Factors aggravating a sentence for corruption

or a corruption related offence In considering imposing a sentence for corruption or a corruption related offence, the court shall be guided by the following aggravating factors-

(a)

a corrupt intent or knowledge of effect of the act or omission to act;

(b)

abuse of office for personal or third party benefit;

(c)

the prejudicial nature of the corrupt act to the organization or public body;

(d)

whether the offence was committed in respect of a contract, sub-contract or proposal for a contract with an organization or public body;

(e)

the degree of pre-meditation; (f) the degree of sophistication involved in the corrupt act; (g) whether there was a deliberate intent to cause financial loss; (h) whether the offence was committed in respect of essential goods or services; (i) the role of the offender in a group or conspiracy involved in commission of the offence; or (j) any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

44. Factors mitigating a sentence for corruption

or a related offence In considering imposing a sentence for corruption or a corruption related offence, the court shall take into account the following mitigating factors- (a) lack of pre-meditation;

(b)

whether the act is a result of non-deliberate neglect of duty;

(c)

the subordinate or lesser role of the offender in a group or conspiracy involved in the commission of the offence;

(d)

the offender's plea of guilty;

(e)

refund of money or items misappropriated; or

(f)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

Theft and theft related offences

45. Sentencing range for theft and theft related offences
(1)

The court shall be guided by the sentencing range specified in

46. Considerations in determining a sentence for

theft and theft related offences In considering a sentence for theft or a theft related offence, the court shall take into account the following factors-

(a)

the value of the property stolen;

(b)

prevalence of the offence in the community;

(c)

the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence;

(d)

the impact of the offence on the victim and the community;

(e)

any breach of trust where the offender is an employee, relative, neighbour or a person in a position of trust;

(f)

any aggravating or mitigating factors; (g) antecedents of the offender; (h) plea of guilty by the offender; (i) any reparation offered; (j) the operation of restorative justice processes; or (k) any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

47. Factors aggravating a sentence for theft

or a theft related offence In considering imposing a sentence for theft or a theft related offence, the court shall be guided by the following aggravating factors-

(a)

the degree of loss that is serious in the context of the offence;

(b)

the amount of money lost or quantities of goods taken during the commission of the offence;

(C)

the rampant nature of the offence in the organization or public body;

(d)

the offender being in a position of financial or fiduciary trust or both;

(e)

offender's lack of remorsefulness;

(0 habitual offending;

(g)

conversion of the property for use of self or other person;

(h)

deliberate or reckless taking of money in excess of limits of authority or in disregard of procedure;

(i)

significant degree of premeditation;

0) playing a leading role in a group or conspiracy involved in the commission of the offence; or

(k)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

48. Factors mitigating a sentence for theft

or a theft related offence In considering imposing a sentence for theft or a theft related offence, the court shall take into account the following mitigating factors-

(a)

lack of pre-meditation; (b) lack of knowledge of ownership; (c) the subordinate or lesser role of the offender in a group or gang involved in the commission of the offence;

(d)

the offender's plea of guilty;

(e)

the remorsefulness of the offender;

(0 whether the offender is a First offender with no previous conviction or no relevant or recent conviction; or

(g)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

Part IX

49. Sentencing a primary care-giver
(1)

Where it is brought to the attention of the court that an offender is a primary care-giver, the court shall consider the following-

(a)

the effect of a custodial sentence to a child if such a sentence is passed;

(b)

whether the child will adequately be cared for while the care giver is serving the custodial sentence;

(c)

the importance of maintaining the integrity of family care by protecting innocent children from avoidable harm.

(2)

For the purposes of sub-paragraph (1), the court shall-

(a)

recognise each child as an individual with a distinct personality; and (b) shall strike a fair balance between the circumstances of the care-giver and the circumstances of the case.

(3)

Where the appropriate sentence is clearly non custodial, the court shall determine the sentence bearing in mind the interests of the child.

(4)

Where there is a range of sentences available to the court, the court shall use the welfare principle as provided for under section 3 of the Children Act in deciding which sentence to impose.

(5)

In determining a sentence for an offender who is a primary care giver, the court shall ensure that the sentence is the least damaging sentence to the interest of the child.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Mandatory duty

This section imposes mandatory requirements concerning “Sentencing a primary care-giver”.

“(1) Where it is brought to the attention of the court that an offender is a primary care-giver, the court shall consider the following-”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The provision uses mandatory language; the responsible person or institution should be able to demonstrate compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

9
  1. (1) Where it is brought to the attention of the court that an offender is a primary care-giver, the court shall consider the following-
  2. (a) the effect of a custodial sentence to a child if such a sentence is passed;
  3. (b) whether the child will adequately be cared for while the care giver is serving the custodial sentence;
  4. (c) the importance of maintaining the integrity of family care by protecting innocent children from avoidable harm.
  5. (2) For the purposes of sub-paragraph (1), the court shall-
  6. (a) recognise each child as an individual with a distinct personality; and (b) shall strike a fair balance between the circumstances of the care-giver and the circumstances of the case.
  7. (3) Where the appropriate sentence is clearly non custodial, the court shall determine the sentence bearing in mind the interests of the child.
  8. (4) Where there is a range of sentences available to the court, the court shall use the welfare principle as provided for under section 3 of the Children Act in deciding which sentence to impose.

1 further item remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions
Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
50. Sentencing of child offenders
(1)

When making an order against a child offender, the court shall consider the following-

(a)

the degree of participation of the child;

(b)

best interests of the child;

(c)

protection of the community from harm and ensuring people's personal safety;

(d)

rehabilitation of the child;

(e)

any non custodial options provided for in section 94 of the Children Act;

(0 the shortest appropriate period of detention where that is the . only appropriate sentencing option; or

(g)

detention as a last resort if in all the circumstances it is the most appropriate sentence.

(2)

Subject to sub paragraph (1), the court shall-

(a)

consider the effect of a custodial sentence on the child;

(b)

where the appropriate sentence is clearly non custodial, determine the sentence bearing in mind the interests of the child;

(c)

use of the welfare principle as a guide in determining the appropriate sentence to impose; and

(d)

ensure that the appropriate sentence is the least damaging sentence to the interests of the child.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Mandatory duty

This section imposes mandatory requirements concerning “Sentencing of child offenders”.

“(1) When making an order against a child offender, the court shall consider the following-”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The provision uses mandatory language; the responsible person or institution should be able to demonstrate compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

12
  1. (1) When making an order against a child offender, the court shall consider the following-
  2. (a) the degree of participation of the child;
  3. (b) best interests of the child;
  4. (c) protection of the community from harm and ensuring people's personal safety;
  5. (d) rehabilitation of the child;
  6. (e) any non custodial options provided for in section 94 of the Children Act;
  7. (g) detention as a last resort if in all the circumstances it is the most appropriate sentence.
  8. (2) Subject to sub paragraph (1), the court shall-

4 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions
Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part X

51. Determining a fine
(1)

A person liable to imprisonment may be sentenced to pay a fine in addition to or instead of imprisonment.

(2)

Where a fine is imposed under any law, the court shall take into consideration among other things, the means of the offender so far as they are known to the court and in the absence of express provisions relating to a fine, the following shall apply-

(a)

where no sum is expressed to which the fine may extend, the amount of the fine which may be imposed is unlimited , but shall not be excessive;

(b)

in the case of an offence punishable with a fine or imprisonment, the imposition of a fine or a period of imprisonment shall be a matter for the discretion of the court with reasons;

(c)

in the case of an offence punishable with imprisonment as well as a fine in which the offender is sentenced to a fine with or without imprisonment, and in every case of an offence punishable with a fine only in which the offender is sentenced to a fine, the court passing sentence may-

(i)

direct by its sentence that in default of payment of the fine, the offender shall suffer imprisonment for a certain period, which imprisonment shall be in addition to any other imprisonment to which he or she may have been sentenced or to which he or she may be liable under a commutation of sentence and;

(ii)

issue a warrant for the levy of the amount on the immovable and moveable property of the offender by distress and sale under warrant except that if the sentence directs that in default of payment of a fine the offender shall be imprisoned, and if the offender has undergone the whole of the imprisonment in default, no court shall issue a distress warrant unless for special reasons to be recorded in writing court considers it necessary to do so;

(d)

the period of imprisonment ordered by the court in respect of non-payment of any sum of money adjudged to be paid by a conviction or in respect of the default of a sufficient distress to satisfy any such sum shall be such term as in the opinion of the court will satisfy the justice of the case but shall not exceed in any case the maximum fixed by the scale set out in the Fourth Schedule.

(e)

the imprisonment which is imposed in default of payment of a Fine shall terminate whenever the fine is either paid or levied by process of law.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Definition

This section supplies the definitions or statutory meaning governing “Determining a fine”.

“(1) A person liable to imprisonment may be sentenced to pay a fine in addition to or instead of imprisonment.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this definition when interpreting other provisions that employ the language addressed by “Determining a fine”.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

9
  1. (1) A person liable to imprisonment may be sentenced to pay a fine in addition to or instead of imprisonment.
  2. (2) Where a fine is imposed under any law, the court shall take into consideration among other things, the means of the offender so far as they are known to the court and in the absence of express provisions relating to a fine, the following shall apply-
  3. (a) where no sum is expressed to which the fine may extend, the amount of the fine which may be imposed is unlimited , but shall not be excessive;
  4. (b) in the case of an offence punishable with a fine or imprisonment, the imposition of a fine or a period of imprisonment shall be a matter for the discretion of the court with reasons;
  5. (c) in the case of an offence punishable with imprisonment as well as a fine in which the offender is sentenced to a fine with or without imprisonment, and in every case of an offence punishable with a fine only in which the offender is sentenced to a fine, the court passing sentence may-
  6. (i) direct by its sentence that in default of payment of the fine, the offender shall suffer imprisonment for a certain period, which imprisonment shall be in addition to any other imprisonment to which he or she may have been sentenced or to which he or she may be liable under a commutation of sentence and;
  7. (ii) issue a warrant for the levy of the amount on the immovable and moveable property of the offender by distress and sale under warrant except that if the sentence directs that in default of payment of a fine the offender shall be imprisoned, and if the offender has undergone the whole of the imprisonment in default, no court shall issue a distress warrant unless for special reasons to be recorded in writing court considers it necessary to do so;
  8. (d) the period of imprisonment ordered by the court in respect of non-payment of any sum of money adjudged to be paid by a conviction or in respect of the default of a sufficient distress to satisfy any such sum shall be such term as in the opinion of the court will satisfy the justice of the case but shall not exceed in any case the maximum fixed by the scale set out in the Fourth Schedule.

1 further item remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part XI

52. Making a community service order
(1)

The court that makes a community service order shall use the basic grid provided in the Community Service Regulations.

(2)

Where the court deviates from the basic grid, the court shall give reasons taking into consideration the following-

(a)

the nature of punishment;

(b)

the age of the offender;

(c)

history of the offender's previous compliance or non- compliance;

(d)

the purpose of the punishment; (e) the nature of work to be performed by the offender; (f) the value of the work to be performed; or

(g)

the physical and health condition of the offender.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Procedural rule

This section establishes the governing procedure for “Making a community service order”.

“(1) The court that makes a community service order shall use the basic grid provided in the Community Service Regulations.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A litigant should address this rule at the procedural stage named in the section and preserve evidence of compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

7
  1. (1) The court that makes a community service order shall use the basic grid provided in the Community Service Regulations.
  2. (2) Where the court deviates from the basic grid, the court shall give reasons taking into consideration the following-
  3. (a) the nature of punishment;
  4. (b) the age of the offender;
  5. (c) history of the offender's previous compliance or non- compliance;
  6. (d) the purpose of the punishment; (e) the nature of work to be performed by the offender; (f) the value of the work to be performed; or
  7. (g) the physical and health condition of the offender.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
53. Other matters to take into account
(1)

Before making a community service order, the court shall satisfy itself that-

(a)

community service work is suitable for the offence;

(b)

it is appropriate in all circumstances that a community service order is the best order for the offender; or

(c)

the offender has consented to undertake community service in the form prescribed by the Community Service Regulations, to comply with his or her obligations under the community service order.

(2)

In addition to the matters under the Community Service Act and the Community Service Regulations, the court shall before granting an order for community service, consider-

(a)

whether the work is community related;

(b)

the skills and experiences of the offender;

(c)

the views of the victim or the victims regarding the referral of the offender to the community for community service; (d) restoring the rights of the victims of the offence;

(e)

the history of the offender's previous compliance or non- compliance;

(f)

whether the offender is suffering from any adverse health conditions;

(g)

the likely benefit of the community service to the community;

(h)

the age of the offender; or

(i)

any other factor as the court may consider relevant.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Other matters to take into account”.

“(1) Before making a community service order, the court shall satisfy itself that-”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

13
  1. (1) Before making a community service order, the court shall satisfy itself that-
  2. (a) community service work is suitable for the offence;
  3. (b) it is appropriate in all circumstances that a community service order is the best order for the offender; or
  4. (c) the offender has consented to undertake community service in the form prescribed by the Community Service Regulations, to comply with his or her obligations under the community service order.
  5. (2) In addition to the matters under the Community Service Act and the Community Service Regulations, the court shall before granting an order for community service, consider-
  6. (a) whether the work is community related;
  7. (b) the skills and experiences of the offender;
  8. (c) the views of the victim or the victims regarding the referral of the offender to the community for community service; (d) restoring the rights of the victims of the offence;

5 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions
Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
54. Pre-sentence report
(1)

For the purposes of determining whether community service is the appropriate sentence or making a community service order, the court may require the prosecution, the offender or any other person to make a pre-sentence report in respect of the offender.

(2)

A pre-sentence report may contain- (a) a recommendation of the orders and conditions on which the sentence may be imposed; (b) a recommendation on how the conditions can be used to achieve the objectives of the sentence; (c) the reasons indicating that the offender is suitable to undergo community service; (d) the likely benefits of the sentence to the offender taking into consideration the interests of the victim; (e) the safety of the victim, offender and the community during the serving of the sentence; (0 the skills or any other useful abilities of the offender to the community; and (g) any matter that court may request the social worker or other designated person to provide.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Pre-sentence report”.

“(1) For the purposes of determining whether community service is the appropriate sentence or making a community service order, the court may require the prosecution, the offender or any other person to make a pre-sentence report in respect of the offender.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

2
  1. (1) For the purposes of determining whether community service is the appropriate sentence or making a community service order, the court may require the prosecution, the offender or any other person to make a pre-sentence report in respect of the offender.
  2. (2) A pre-sentence report may contain- (a) a recommendation of the orders and conditions on which the sentence may be imposed; (b) a recommendation on how the conditions can be used to achieve the objectives of the sentence; (c) the reasons indicating that the offender is suitable to undergo community service; (d) the likely benefits of the sentence to the offender taking into consideration the interests of the victim; (e) the safety of the victim, offender and the community during the serving of the sentence; (0 the skills or any other useful abilities of the offender to the community; and (g) any matter that court may request the social worker or other designated person to provide.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Part XII

55. Duty of the prosecution
(1)

During sentencing, the prosecution shall present to the court the following- (a) increase in the incidence of certain offences which may include crimes against women and children, economic or white collar crimes, as well as crimes against humanity; (b) the applicable penalty provisions for statutory offences; (c) reported decisions concerning sentences; (d) sufficient facts to enable the court impose an appropriate sentence; or (e) any relevant information relating to the offender.

(2)

For the purposes of sub-paragraph (1) information relating to an offender includes-

(a)

the circumstances under which the offence was committed; (b) the offender's background; (c) the offender's family; (d) the offender's past criminal record; (e) the responsibilities the offender has in society and whether the offender is a primary care giver;

(f)

the offender's means of livelihood; (g) the offender's social status; (h) the likelihood of the offender to reform; or (i) any other relevant information.

(3)

The prosecution shall present to the court all relevant information relating to-

(a)

the impact of the crime on the victim, family members of the victim and the community, including the impact statements relating to the victim and the community;

(b)

statistics regarding the frequency and relative seriousness of the offence;

(c)

the degree of preparedness with which the crime was committed;

(d)

the problems encountered in trying to prevent the commission of the crime in question; and

(e)

any other aggravating factors that may be relevant to the facts of the case.

(4)

The prosecution shall present sufficient facts before court to show any aggravating or other relevant factors under which the offence was committed.

(5)

Upon conviction, the prosecution shall summarize to the court any aggravating factors arising from any inquiry or report, the victim impact statements and community impact statements to assist the court to determine the most appropriate sentence.

(6)

For the purposes of sentencing, the prosecution shall when making any submissions to the court, have a fair balance of the interest of the victim and the general public interest.

Specific duties for the prosecution

56. Indication of sentence

The prosecution shall indicate to the court the sentence which in the opinion of the prosecution is appropriate for the offence.

57. Amicable settlements and restorative justice
(1)

Where parties express interest to reconcile in cases that are permitted under the law, the prosecution shall bring the matter to the attention of the court and shall request the court to give the parties an opportunity to settle such matters amicably.

(2)

The prosecution shall promote and advocate for restorative justice as a viable means of dispute resolution where applicable.

58. Ancillary, compensatory and related orders
(1)

The prosecution shall apply for ancillary, compensatory and confiscation orders in all appropriate cases.

(2)

When considering which ancillary orders to apply for, the prosecution shall have regard to the needs of the victim including protection of the victim.

59. Adducing evidence to disprove mitigation

The prosecution shall disprove beyond reasonable doubt any assertion made by the defence in mitigation.

Duty of the defence

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Mandatory duty

This section imposes mandatory requirements concerning “Adducing evidence to disprove mitigation”.

“The prosecution shall disprove beyond reasonable doubt any assertion made by the defence in mitigation.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The provision uses mandatory language; the responsible person or institution should be able to demonstrate compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. The prosecution shall disprove beyond reasonable doubt any assertion made by the defence in mitigation.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history
60. Duty of the defence
(1)

During sentencing, it is the duty of the defence to inform the court about-

(a)

the offender's social background and social status;

(b)

details about the offender's family including dependants, if any;

(c)

any responsibilities of the offender, including whether the offender is a primary care-giver;

(d)

the offender's sources of income and financial status;

(e)

the likelihood of the offender to reform;

(f)

remorsefulness of the offender; or

(g)

any other mitigating factors that may be relevant to the case.

(2)

Where the offender wishes to reconcile with the victim, the . defence shall state that expressly to the court and the prosecutor.

39 V

SCHEDULES Paragraph 14 FIRST SCHEDULE FORMS Republic of Uganda FORM A VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT

Part II

3. Name of victim*

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

4. Marital status

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

5. Age

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

6. Address

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

7. Number of children

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Part I

1. Offence

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

2. Date of commission of offence

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Part II

3. Village

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

4. Parish/ ward

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

5. Sub county/Division

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

6. County

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

7. District/City

The text of this section isn't in the consolidation we hold — see the original PDF above.

Part III

8. How has the offence or crime

affected the community financially? (a) is there any loss of income.

(b)

if Yes, how much

(c)

investment or business opportunities lost:

(d)

description of financial support to the victim or other members of the community after the offence

9. Expenses incurred by the community as

a result of the crime or offence (include all the actual costs involved such as meetings to warn or address members of the community, medical, funeral expenses, costs for therapy)

Part IV

10. Injuries sustained by members of the

public or community during the commission of the crime or offence

Emotional Effect

11. Description of the emotional distress and

psychological effect of the crime on the community

12. Description of any counseling or psychological

treatment within the community

PartV Property lost or damaged

13. Description of community or public property

lost or damaged during the commission of the crime or offence

Part VI

14. Statement on prevalence of this crime in the area since

the commission of the offence

Da te: _ __________________________________ __________ Name: _ S i gnat u re:_______________ ________________________________ Position in community, e.g. local council, traditional or religious leader:

* The Community impact statement may be filled by

(a)

the local council officials; (b) the traditional leaders; (c) any interested member of the community: or any other person with information to that effect.

Paragraph 14

SECOND SCHEDULE

Factors to take into consideration when sentencing.

When determining a sentence, the court shall take into account the following-

(a)

antecedents of the offender or habitual offender or first offender; (b) gravity or nature of the offence; (c) brutality or nature of weapon used; (d) time spent on remand; (e) remorsefulness of the offender; (0 age; (g) health; (h) gender; (i) prevalence of the offence; (i) social status, family status and background; (k) intention or motive; (l) impact on society; (m) cost of imprisonment to the State; (n) financial status; (o) domestic violence; (P) stage of the trial and the circumstances within which a plea of guilty was made; (q) the harm caused, the harm intended to be caused, or the harm that might have foreseeably been caused (value of property involved and loss occasioned to victim); (r) complexity and sophistication of the offence; (s) amount of personal profit; (t) education or employment background; (u) accused's relations with the community; (v) role of the offender in the commission of the offence; or (w) any other factor that the court may consider relevant.

Paragraph 19 THIRD SCHEDULE Sentencing ranges

Part I

1. Murder (Sections 188 Death 35 years

From 30 years up to death and 189 Penal Code Act, Cap. 120)

2. Rape (Sections 123 Death 35 years From 30 years up to death

and 124) of the penal code Act Cap 120

3. Aggravated defilement Death 35 years From

30 years up to death (Sections 129, 130 and 133 of the Penal Code Act, Cap. 120 as amended by the Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2007)

4. Robbery (sections 285 Death 35 years

From 30 years up to death and 286(2) of the penal code Act Cap 120

5. Kidnap with intent to Death 35

years From 30 years up to death murder Section 243 of the sentence Penal Code Act Cap 120

6. Terrorism Section 6 Death 35 years From 30 years up to death

of the Anti-Terrorism Act, No. 14 of2002

7. Treason Section 25 of Death 35

years From 30 years up to death the Penal Code Act Cap 120

Paragraph 27

Part II

Part III

1. Robbery 10 years' 5 years From one year up to

(Sections 285 and imprisonment years imprisonment 286(1)) of the Imprisonment 15 years From 3 years up to Penal Code Act for life imprisonment for life Cap 120

2. Attempted 7 years 3 and a From 9 months up to

Robbery (Section imprisonment half years years imprisonment 287) of the Penal Code Act Cap 120

Paragraph 33

Part IV

1. Simple Imprisonment 15 years From 3 years up to

Defilement for life imprisonment for life (Sections 129 , 130 and 133 ) of the Penal Code Act Cap 120

2. Attempted 18 years' 9 years From one year up to 18 years

defilement imprisonment (Section 129(2) ) of the Penal Code Act Cap 120

3. Defilement of 14 years' 7 years From 8 months up to 14 years

idiots or imbeciles imprisonment (Section 130 ) of the Penal Code Act Cap 120

4. Permitting 5 years' 2 and a From 3 months up to 5 years

Defilement imprisonment half years (section 133 ) of the Penal Code Act Cap 120

Paragraph 37

Part V

1. False accounting 3 years' One and a From 6 months up to

by a public officer imprisonment half years years' imprisonment (section 2 2)Anti Corrupt ion Act, No. 6/2009)

2. Embezzlement 14 years' 7 years From 2 years up to

(section 19 )Anti- imprisonment years' imprisonment Corruption Act, No. 6/2009)

3. Causing 14 years' 7 years From 2 years up to 7 years'

financial loss imprisonment imprisonment (Section 20 )Anti Corruption Act, No. 6/2009)

4. Solicitation 12 years' 6 years From 3 years up to

and/or receipt of imprisonment years' imprisonment gratification (Sections 2 and 2 6)Anti Corruption Act, No. 6/2009)

5. Bribery of a 12 years' 6 years From 3 years up to

public official imprisonment years. (Section 5 and 26 ) Anti-Corruption Act, No. 6/2009)

6. Abuse of office 7 years' 3 and a From one year up to

(Section 11 ) Anti imprisonment half years years imprisonment Corruption Act, No. 6/2009)

Paragraph 45

1. Obtaining 5 years' 2 and a From 6 months up to

goods by false imprisonment half years years pretence (Section 305 ) Penal Code Act Cap 120

2. Theft 10 years' 5 years From one year up to

(Sections 254 and imprisonment years 261) Penal Code Act Cap 120

Paragraph 51

FOURTH SCHEDULE Scale for determination of fines. Amount Maximum Period Not exceeding 0.5 of a currency point 7 days Exceeding 0.5 of a currency point but 14 days not exceeding one currency point Exceeding one currency point but not One month two currency points Exceeding two currency points but not 6 weeks three currency points Exceeding three currency points but not 3 months six currency points Exceeding six currency points 12 months

Currency point is equal to twenty thousand shillings.

B.J. ODOKI, Chief Justice.

Cross references. Children Act, Cap 59. Community Service Act, Cap. 115 Community Service Regulations, SI No.55 of 2001 Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995 Magistrates Courts Act, Cap. 16 Penal Code Act, Cap. 120 Trial on Indictments Act, Cap. 23 The Revision (Fines and Other Financial Amounts in Criminal Matters) Act No. 14, 2008

Original Laws of Uganda consolidation (as at 24 May 2013) — public-domain legislation, consolidated by ULII / Laws.Africa (CC BY 4.0). This is a point-in-time text and may not reflect later amendments; confirm against the latest Uganda Gazette before relying on it.