(1)
Where a financial institution is a party to a specified financial contract and is placed under management take-over in accordance with section 88 of the Act or closed under any provision of the Act, the following transactions entered into by that financial institution shall not be void-
(a)
any delivery, payment, transfer, substitution or exchange of cash, margin, collateral, credit support or any other interests or assets from the financial institution to the counterparty made before the management take-over or closure of the financial institution, under or in connection with the specified financial contract;
(b)
any payment or delivery obligation incurred by the financial institution and owing to the counterparty before the management take-over or closure of the financial institution, under or in connection with the specified financial contract;
(c)
any netting or set-off of amounts as a result of an early termination of one or more specified financial contracts at the commencement of the management take-over or closure of the financial institution, in accordance with the provisions of the specified financial contract; or
(d)
any payment or delivery obligation incurred by the financial institution and owing to the counterparty as a result of netting or set-off of amounts pursuant to an early termination of one or more specified financial contracts before or after the management take-over or closure of a financial institution.
(2)
Notwithstanding subregulation (1), where it is established that there is clear and convincing evidence that the financial institution made a delivery, payment, transfer, substitution or exchange with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud any entity, the delivery, payment, transfer, substitution or exchange shall be void.
(3)
Where a delivery, payment, transfer, substitution or exchange is found to be void under subregulation (2), the liquidator or statutory manager shall immediately, and in any case not later than two working days, communicate that finding in writing to the financial institution, the counterparty and the Central Bank.
(4)
The communication referred to in subregulation (3) shall state- (a) that the transaction is void; and
(b)
the grounds on which the transaction was rendered void.